1% better

The next Ozempic might fix marriages

Try a 30-second uninterrupted eye-contact ritual with your partner tonight. Sit face-to-face, put phones away, stay quiet, and simply notice the discomfort or warmth that comes up; extend to one minute only if it feels mutually comfortable. The hosts describe this as an intense but simple way to cre

47m

Summary published by , updated .

My First Million

Key Takeaway

Try a 30-second uninterrupted eye-contact ritual with your partner tonight. Sit face-to-face, put phones away, stay quiet, and simply notice the discomfort or warmth that comes up; extend to one minute only if it feels mutually comfortable. The hosts describe this as an intense but simple way to create presence and connection. Treat biochemical “bonding” claims as unproven—not a reason to self-medicate—and use the exercise as a low-risk conversation starter instead.

Episode Overview

The hosts explore two business ideas emerging from the loneliness epidemic: a speculative oxytocin-based approach to relationship bonding and membership communities that combine belonging with financial products. They also discuss values-based media company Angel Studios, A24’s differentiated film strategy, and how successful businesses can arise as a reaction to an entrenched market norm.

Main Insights

Connection rituals can be simpler than relationship advice

The hosts highlight sustained eye contact as a surprisingly intense exercise that can create a sense of presence with a spouse, roommate, or loved one. Rather than trying to solve every relationship problem in one conversation, experiment with a short, deliberate ritual that makes attention unmistakable.

Treat fringe health ideas as signals, not prescriptions

Oxytocin is discussed as a speculative potential aid for bonding, social connection, and counseling, but the hosts repeatedly acknowledge that the evidence they cite is limited and not conclusive. The useful lesson is to watch emerging behavior at the edges of communities while maintaining a high bar for safety, evidence, and medical guidance.

Belonging can be the front end of a durable business

The Knights of Columbus, Good Sam, and USCCA illustrate a model in which a shared identity creates trust, membership value, and a distribution channel for relevant financial products or services. Community is not merely a marketing tactic here; it is the reason members join and remain engaged.

Look for the reaction to the action

The hosts describe Snapchat as a reaction to Facebook’s permanent, public social graph, and A24 as a reaction to Hollywood’s preference for predictable blockbuster franchises. When a dominant behavior becomes excessive or standardized, ask what opposite experience people increasingly want.

Differentiation improves when customers help choose the product

Angel Studios reportedly lets its member community vote on which projects receive support, aligning its content slate with a clearly defined audience. This lowers guesswork: build an audience around a worldview or need, then use direct feedback to decide what to create next.

Frameworks or Models

Reaction-to-Action Business Idea Scan

1. Identify a dominant product, behavior, or market norm. 2. Name the side effect it creates, such as excess permanence, convenience, sameness, or overstimulation. 3. Design the counter-position that delivers the opposite benefit. 4. Test whether a growing group wants that reaction strongly enough to pay for it.

Interest-Community Membership Model

1. Start with a specific shared identity, interest, or worldview. 2. Build belonging through local chapters, content, events, training, or charitable activity. 3. Charge membership dues and provide immediate member benefits. 4. Partner with, or eventually offer, relevant financial or insurance products where the community’s trust creates a distribution advantage.

Four-Quadrant Movie Model

1. Divide the potential audience into broad age and gender segments. 2. Assess whether a film appeals across all segments. 3. Studios favor projects with broad four-quadrant appeal because the potential audience is larger. 4. The hosts argue that this preference can leave differentiated, niche projects underserved.

Notable Quotes

"I would try to end the tragedy of divorce with oxytocin doping for marriage counseling."

— Palmer Luckey

"If you were starting with zero today, some bet you made wiped you out. You got to start again. You didn't have your network. You didn't have your wealth. What would you do today, Palmer?"

— Shaan Puri

"Most of the time when you ask somebody, what would you do if you started up again? They'll just give you the most vague hand wavy. He immediately had not only a great original novel, surprising idea, but he had the pitch ready to go, locked and loaded."

— Shaan Puri

"One of my business theories is that a great way to think of a business idea is to find the reaction to the action."

— Shaan Puri

"The popularity of one creates the need for the other."

— Shaan Puri

Action Items

  • 1
    Do a 30-second connection check-in

    Ask a partner or trusted person to try 30 seconds of quiet, mutual eye contact tonight. Put devices away, agree that either person can stop at any time, and afterward share one sentence about what the exercise felt like.

  • 2
    Map one community you already belong to

    List a group you identify with—parents, runners, remote workers, hobbyists, faith community, or local residents. Write down its recurring needs, existing benefits, and one trusted service members already buy.

  • 3
    Use the reaction-to-action scan

    Pick a dominant product or behavior in your industry. Identify what it makes abundant, annoying, public, expensive, or impersonal, then brainstorm three offerings that provide the opposite experience.

  • 4
    Create an evidence filter for health trends

    Before trying a health intervention seen online, separate anecdotes from clinical evidence, check risks and regulation, and discuss it with a qualified clinician. Prefer low-risk behavioral experiments, such as connection rituals, over unverified substances.

Full Transcript

Transcript of The next Ozempic might fix marriages from My First Million. Auto-generated from episode audio; may contain minor errors.

We're going back to the roots a little bit with MFM. Everyone says they want more ideas. I've got two of them. I feel like I can rule the world. I know I could be what I want to. I put my all in it like no days off on the road. Let's travel. OK, so everyone's lonely. We know this. I want to talk to you about two different radical ideas. If you're listening to this podcast, we know. You know, we know. Well, these two ideas I've already been interested in and I was just trying to find an excuse to tie them together.

I'm trying to make this cohesive, but they're two great ideas. And we have a precedent of getting this first one somewhat ish right. We have predicted a couple like biohacking things, not predicted. That takes too much credit. But like we talked about it fairly early in the adoption cycle. Would you agree? We're basically big pharma. We have predicted and developed several several pharmaceutical drugs on this podcast. Would you like to go down memory lane of a couple of them? I don't actually know all the ones that we did.

Obviously, GLP ones, testosterone. What else are we talking about for a long time? You you've brought up GLP ones kind of before they even got to market before Ozempic ever got to market TRT businesses. And you were toying around with the idea of like, hey, I really believe there's a big business to be built here. We didn't end up building one, but we would have invested in. We well, we invested in one that that worked. You also talked about sperm freezing, not just egg freezing. And I think that's also become quite a big deal.

We've talked about IVF, you know, fairly early on and the different business opportunities that exist in IVF. I don't think anyone's actually done those yet. The idea there is to build a a trusted brand in the IVF world, a chain the Chick-fil-A of IVF, as I like to say, a place you trust. OK, but go on. What do you got now? So I was scrolling on Instagram the other day and I saw two things. One, a new version or rather another health trend that I think is going to be popular and to probably the best way to position this new trend I've ever seen.

So Palmer Luckey, CEO, founder of Andro, also started Oculus. He was at this conference and someone said something to him, a question that I tend to hate. And he's one of the few people I've ever seen to answer this question in a great way. The question was basically, Palmer, if you were starting from zero and you had nothing, no connections, what would you do? What would you work on? And he had the best answer. If you were starting with zero today, some bet you made wiped you out.

You got to start again. You didn't have your network. You didn't have your wealth. What would you do today, Palmer? I would try to end the tragedy of divorce with oxytocin doping for marriage counseling. We understand mammal pair bonding pretty well. There's a lot of people who want to stay together. Most of the people who don't want to stay together should stay together, especially for their kids. Look, if people think SSRIs are fine, which they're not, but if they were, then oxytocin doping to stay together is definitely fine.

It's really critical, right? So, you know, people sort of drift apart over time. Oxytocin is safe, but it's safe. It's understood. We use it on mothers and infants. It's the bonding hormone. That's right. It's the mammal pair bonding chemical. There's things you can do to increase the uptake. And it's very well understood. Also, totally unregulated, which is great. Unregulated spaces are a lot easier. You can go buy a kilogram of oxytocin on Sigma Aldrich chemical supply right now. And if you do that, maybe you won't.

Maybe you won't die alone. OK, so let's recap what we just heard here. So Palmer Luckey, tens of billionaire guy, very successful. He said, if I had to work on something again, it'd be saving America from the tragedy of divorce. And that would be oxytocin doping for marriage counseling. If you do this, maybe you won't die alone. How great is that? Is that brilliant? Is that the good? You're absolutely right. Most of the time when you ask somebody, what would you do if you started up again?

They'll just give you the most vague hand wavy. He immediately had not only a great original novel, surprising idea, but he had the pitch ready to go, locked and loaded. The best. And I hate using the F word first principles. I hate using that word because it's overplayed and it's not used correctly. But this is like a kind of a textbook case of that. He starts with divorce is a huge deal. It impacts 50 percent of people. What are some potential ideas that could solve the tragedy of divorce?

You could say a bunch of stuff. You could say like helping people find the right person, having good conversations early in on a relationship. OK, whatever. Like what all could do this? And somehow he got to this idea of oxytocin. And I think that is brilliant. I'm not saying that. In fact, I am saying I know nothing about oxytocin other than a little bit of like nerdy research. So I'm not I'm not saying that oxytocin is necessarily great. What I'm saying is the packaging of this is beautiful.

And when I heard this, I realized this is actually an interesting business idea. And I've heard about oxytocin. The reason I've heard about it is I follow these weird subreddits with biohacking, and this is how I learned about GLP ones. This is how I learned about a little bit about testosterone. And what I've noticed is oftentimes these people are wrong. They'll say things that are kind of ridiculous. But occasionally there comes conversations where you're like, OK, there's a signal here. Something is interesting. And I followed along on the oxytocin forum on on Reddit, the subreddit.

And there's there's this one called oxy just oxytocin. And I and it's basically mostly autistic people. So a lot of people who have Asperger's, a lot of people who suffer from PTSD and they've been taking oxytocin for a few years now because it's fairly unregulated. And I'll explain what it is in a minute. And they've like are writing like a daily journal about how it makes them feel. And it's kind of amazing. So what is oxytocin? Oxytocin is a hormone that naturally occurs in your body.

The most common way that people get oxytocin is when women have babies. It creates a bonding between the mother and the the infant. And so right when they have the kid, it like oxytocin. I believe it's one of the when it gets released, the mother starts creating milk and they bond. Men get it after they have sex. You know, when you're cuddling, you know, that nice feeling. That's because of oxytocin. A lot of mammals, a lot of animals that is a strong correlation between when you when mammals have a lot of oxytocin, they do bonding better with their partner.

So they'll be like they study these. I think it's called prairie dogs, something like that. And they have huge amounts of oxytocin and they are lifelong partners with their spouse forever. Right? Yeah. Like if I have a really solid dap up with somebody, perfect hand clap. I feel a small surge of this male part of this pair bonding chemical released in my body. I can almost hear it when it happens or when you look your dog in the eye. So there are studies that show when you look at your dog and make eye contact with your dog, you release a little bit of oxytocin.

Dude, when is it? Have you have you recently? Just had like silent eye contact, very like you're four inches away from your wife and you just hold eye contact for like 30 seconds to a minute. Have you done this? No. But your friend, Chris Williamson, put out this thing where it was like questions to ask spouses to like make you bond. And like part of it was looking at eye contact together. And I told my wife, I was like, hey, I want to try this. And it's like, so we have like a scheduled time to do this.

I mean, it's a little bit weird. But if you want to be adventurous tonight, the eye contact thing is full on eye contact. Do you do it? Hey, I want to tell you about something pretty cool. We have a database of all of the business ideas that have been discussed on this podcast. So hundreds of episodes, the team at HubSpot went through. They pulled out all the simple, relatable, interesting, profitable ideas that we have brainstormed, and they're all available for download for free. Just click the link in the description below.

Thank you to our friends at HubSpot for sponsoring this podcast and putting together this free resource for you guys. Back to the show. Yeah, I've done this before, and my wife literally starts crying. It would make me cry. Within 30 seconds, she starts crying. It's like the most bizarre thing to me because I don't feel the urge to cry. I do. There's definitely an intensity to it when you're just quiet and you're looking straight into the eyes of somebody who you know really well. I'm going to do it today.

I'm going to do it tonight. In fact, that's everybody's homework tonight. 30 seconds, maybe a minute, if you're feeling freaky, of straight up eye contact. Yeah, it doesn't matter if it's your spouse or a roommate. Just the stare. Or the mirror, if you're really, you know, if you're really in one of the Spotify wrapped top 1% listeners. Well, one of the reasons why you feel that way is because of the chemical or the hormone oxytocin. This is isn't this also why like skin to skin contact with a baby?

Like kind of you hold the baby on your chest. They make you like take your shirt off in the hospital. Yeah. Amongst amongst other things, you'd laugh. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I do that with my kids. I'll be holding them and I'll take my I pop the top. I take the shirt off and I like I want to hold them because it feels special. You bond more. And and what I didn't realize is that I if you if you Google buy oxytocin, you'll get like a bunch of interesting websites.

They're usually called like something sciences or something pharmaceuticals where you can buy it and like a pure. I don't know if it's pure. I'm not using these words correctly, but from a from an idiot's point of view, like a pure block of it, it's a powder, a butter. What do you mean? Like it looks like a nasal spray. OK, so here's what I'm getting at. It's it's like a powder. But now some wholesale. Yes, you can buy a ton of it. And what a lot of companies I'm noticing, they're slowly getting into.

If you go to Blue Chew, which sells erectile dysfunction medicine, if you if you go to him's, I imagine they might start selling this. But you're noticing is that this fringe thing is being turned into a nasal spray because that's the only way that you could take it. You could either take it to that or I think like a like a gas mask. You can't inject it. And it's not a pill, but they're starting to sell this. And my prediction is you do need a prescription for it.

It looks like not to buy on some of these websites, like you can just you can click and order it right now. Yes. So you sent this over and this immediately got my like, I feel like my brain overheated for a minute, because when you hear a genuinely interesting, great idea that you don't understand fully, you don't know, you haven't researched it. You don't know the efficacy of it. You don't know the safety of it. So that those are all the caveats. Yeah. By the way, it could it could still be bullshit.

Like, right. Like this is totally understudied. So let's preface everything by saying that. Well, we should explain the prairie vole thing, the study that they did. So most animals are not monogamous. Right. But there are a few that are that have an intense bond, a monogamy. And so they've studied these prairie voles where once the male and female mate and they bond and they spend enough of this brief time together, they will be monogamous for life. And they will not only not go with other partners, they'll even attack.

If another like if a male is there and a female comes, he will like kind of push her away. And then they did studies on this in a very small sample size. So not like a robust study, like a maybe bullshit study where they did this with humans and they had a placebo and they had humans that would take oxytocin and they would see what would happen. And, you know, for example, in one of them, they would have an attractive female come in. And if the person had had the oxytocin bonding with their partner, they would sit like an extra 15 centimeters apart from the attractive people.

They would create distance between them and the attractive female or they would spend less time looking at them, things like that. Now, again, small studies. But it's very interesting that most people, we like to think. That we're in control of our mind, that we're in control of how we how we're going to feel and how we're going to act. And so I'd say there's one one group of people that think they can think their way to a behavior. There's another group of people that would be feelings based.

And they say, well, it's not about logic and and thinking your way there. It's a feeling thing. But feelings to them are this amorphous sort of, you know, mystical thing. It's just something that happens about is like the idea of a soul. Whereas in truth, the feeling basically a feeling is a chemical brain state that you're in. And then you have a conscious readout of it that says, oh, I really like the way that that means that means I'm in love. Right. This brain state, this way I feel when I'm doing this or when I'm with this person, that means I love this.

That means I hate this. That means I'm disgusted by this. Right. So we have a kind of a readout of the chemical state. And if we could find safe ways. To. Alter or or or grease the wheels on certain chemical states. That's really interesting to me. And the reason why is all these ideas sound a little far fetched before we had the miracle weight loss drugs, right? Like there used to literally be a phrase that was like, there's no magic pill for weight loss, but now there is.

There's literally a magic pill for weight loss. Well, what if there's a magic pill for for love or for being bonded with your partner? I find that really, really interesting. And then I think further the example you just gave of people who are autistic or have Asperger's using this to bridge maybe a social gap that they have is really interesting. And when I was reading about this just before the podcast, you mentioned this idea and I'd never heard of it. One of the ways that it was described was it's like a highlighter.

So it's not that it's not a love potion. It's not like you take something and you immediately fall in love with the first person you see or anything like that. What it does is it highlights or amplifies what you feel. So they did studies where if somebody was domestically abused, they wouldn't this wouldn't like override that and make them feel loved towards the person. It would heighten their sense of distance between that person. So it was taking whatever the social feeling you have underneath and just amplifying it.

So if it was bad, it would amplify that you want to get away from that person. And if it was good, the warmth, it would amplify the warmth for that person. So I find that really I find that that angle of it to be really promising because that would be life changing for people who have trouble connecting socially and in relationships, right? Yeah, it's pretty magical. Well, the idea is magical. And I was listening to someone else, some other doctor talk about it. And he was basically saying he was like, look, like there's not like that much data to back this up.

So it's not necessarily that it's disproven, but it's also not proven. been yet. But he was like, we've been doing some small stuff where we would give it to like small teams. And he didn't explain what a team was, but it could have been like co-workers or even a sports team, whatever, people working together. And he was like, they worked together so much better when they all had small doses of oxytocin. And I found that to be really fascinating. And I like ideas that seem very freakish and strange.

Like imagine walking into your office or going to a team retreat, which I just had, and everyone has to do oxytocin in advance. That's very weird, right? That's off-putting, that's strange. But like, maybe, maybe that's kind of interesting. And so I went and texted. Adam Neumann somewhere is like, yes, not weird. We are doing that. But I think it's interesting. I think this is very interesting. And I tweeted this out. I'm like, who has done this? And someone was like, don't do stuff that you read on forums.

And I'm like, yeah, don't do it because we are talking about it or because someone else is talking about it. But there's some interesting signal there, particularly from a marketing standpoint, but potentially for like a selfish standpoint of like, maybe, maybe there is something here because I've seen this enough times that when people that we call strange, where they're doing something, there's something there. And there's a subreddit where these guys, there's one guy who had Asperger's and he was talking about, I keep calling it Asperger's.

Is it Asperger's? Am I saying it wrong? Sorry, guys. I think there's a P in there somewhere between the ass and the burger that you're saying. Asperger's. Sorry, guys. The subreddit where these guys who have this are talking about like they're writing daily journals and they're like, all right, I just took the dose. Okay, I'm feeling hoardy now. That's probably too much of a dose. Okay, 10 hours later, I took a second dose. I noticed that I struggled to make eye contact with my children most of the time.

Now, it was way easier to make eye contact and I had a significantly better conversation. They're documenting this and it's so interesting to me. I would not be surprised if in 12 months, you and me and our listener are going to get a lot of meta ads saying this will cure divorce or something like that. Well, I'm the type that I have an initial reaction to these things. I don't do drugs. I don't even go to Burning Man because I'm scared of just new experience. I'm very happy to chill in a happy little bubble.

I always have a kind of fear-based reaction to things that sound weird, unfamiliar, or chemically altering. I think there's definitely some good in that. Obviously, you can protect yourself that way. It's also over time, I've seen how things that initially sounded very fringe can become very normal in not that long of a time. Years ago, we're like, oh, I hurt my Achilles and so I injected BPC-whatever, 157, and it's healing my Achilles. I'm like, that's a crazy thing to do. You're like, no, it's the Wolverine stack or whatever.

I'm like, yeah, even more reason not to take this. It turns you into a Wolverine or whatever. I don't know. I don't want that. Now peptides are shockingly common. Same thing recently, a psychedelics company just got acquired for $3 billion by Eli Lilly. Did you see this? No, what was it called? It's probably the biggest psychedelic acquisition ever. This company called, I don't know how you say it, Attea Beckley, they just got bought for $2.8 billion. Psychedelics are the same sort of thing, right? Growing up, psychedelics were seen as a certain way, right?

It's like stripping balls and it's a way to have a good time. And now psychedelics is, I would say amongst smart friends, considered to be one of the best interventions for people who have PTSD and other forms of deep trauma as a way to do 20 years of therapy in 20 minutes type of shit. Now, again, this is maybe anecdotal. All I know is it went from very fringe and labeled a certain way to way more mainstream and now seen in a very different light, but it's the same thing.

The sort of social acceptance shifts over time for these things. And I suspect that something like this is also something where social acceptance could shift over time. The idea you said of, hey, before we go to this team retreat, quick, everyone, let's do the flow nays in our nose here real quick. It's going to help. That sounds like laughable right now, but I don't know. I've seen this shift over time many times now, right? So who's to say this isn't also one where that might be true?

I texted Jack Smith, our resident biohacker, and I said, have you ever taken this? And he said, no, but one time an intern at my company got effed up on it after he took some. And then once I took a taxi driver and I was telling the taxi driver about it and he asked to be paid in it. So the opportunity sniffing bloodhounds, something's there. So that's cool. That was one of mine, but I think that's interesting. And so this is one of those things where we're going to have to look back in 12 months and be like, were we on that or not?

10 out of 10. Great segment. Hey, let's take a quick break. You know that feeling when strategy is done, the brief is written, everyone's aligned, and you realize someone still has to sit down and actually create all the content? That someone is usually you and it's due tomorrow. Well, the breeze assistant from HubSpot can help. It works right inside HubSpot. You can draft a campaign copy, blog posts, emails, all in your brand voice, all using your actual customer data. So you don't create just content, you create content that converts.

Check out HubSpot.com, the agentic customer platform for growing businesses. Okay, second one. Have you ever heard of the Knights of Columbus? No. Is this that medieval play that you told me about once? No. Where you go, it's like a buffet? What is that called? No, that's a Renaissance fair. I forget the name of the restaurant. But check this out. So we're talking about the loneliness epidemic a little bit. So in 1882, there was this guy, he was a priest up in New Haven in Connecticut. What was his name?

His name was McGivney. He was a Catholic priest. Someone in his parish died. And he was like, dude, this sucks. This man had two kids and a wife and he died. He was the earner for his family. We have to do something about this. So he convinced something like 200 of his male people and his priests to join what he called a mutual benefit society, where they would all chip in money, and they would help pay for this guy's family for a little while. And then if any of the mother died, some of the money would go towards them.

This sounds very similar to life insurance, right? And that's sort of what it became. And so the Knights of Columbus is now an organization. It's a fraternal organization that's been around since 1882. It has something like 2 or 3 million members. They have $30 billion in assets. They do $5 or $10 billion a year in revenue. And it's a fraternal organization for Catholic men. And the whole thing is that you pay dues, something like $300 a year, and you basically show up in your church after hours and you guys plan charities that you're going to do together.

So predominantly, it's like pancake drives, or they do a lot of homeless stuff. And they're there to help each other. And at this point, they're a huge lobby. It's quite powerful. But the way they make money is they sell life insurance to their members, and they crush it. It's been around for over 100 years, and it's a massive business. And I've always been interested in this type of business. And what this is, is basically a shared interest group that they get together for and help other people or help themselves in a variety of ways.

And it monetizes by selling financial products, insurance products. And I think that this is a really interesting business for a couple reasons. Number one, the Knights of Columbus, they are actually growing mostly through young men. For decades, young men were not joining. It was mostly old men. And they have local chapters. I think they have 14,000 chapters all over the country. And it was mostly old men, and it was dying. And what they're noticing is that young men, between 30 and 40, are joining, and it's their fastest growing segment.

So I'm interested in it for that reason. The second reason I'm interested in it is because these exist for all types of organizations. So for example, let's use Good Sam as an example. Have you heard of Good Sam? No. What is Good Sam? Good Sam is an RV owner membership. So it's all based around a shared identity and community, and they monetize through financial stuff. So Good Sam is if you own an RV, you spend a couple hundred dollars a year, and you get some better insurance for your RV.

But you also get discounts to campgrounds and things like that. Another one is there's this thing for... It's called the USCCA. I was a member of it. When you get your conceal and carry license, you can pay $300, and you can get access to monthly trainings for gun ownership. But also, you get insurance if you ever get prosecuted for shooting someone. And they do about $400 million a year in revenue. And these are huge businesses that last a very long time. And in my opinion, there's a lot of interesting opportunities to jump on this whole loneliness thing and monetize it via financial products.

So you're saying you basically take a deep interest-based community, could be religious, could be non-religious, could be RV owners or whatever. And then you become a member, you get to meet other members, you get community belonging, you get maybe some discounts that immediately justify the value of your membership because it's marketing for them. But the real banana is you figure out how to sell a commodity financial service, but people will have some preferential attachment to you because you are the community. 100%. And I think now is an interesting time because the loneliness thing, it's quite easy to capitalize on that.

And two, these things last forever. What do you think? Well, I mean, I've never heard of this. I have heard of healthcare shares. I mean, in general, that's a thing, right? There's a whole health insurance, life insurance model that's kind of like this. Usually religious, I think, is the general way these go. And I never understood if this is just some tax loophole type stuff or if there's a better value prop for these things. Do you know a lot about these healthcare share programs? For some, it depends what your offering is.

For some of them, there is tax benefits. So there's some weird rules around if you are a membership and you are considered a, I think they call it a mutual benefit membership where everyone gets the same benefits, but you don't have to pay taxes on, I think it's the investment gains of your premium, something like that. There is some tax advantages for sure, but that's not required in order to make this awesome. So I'm looking at this now. So it looks like these healthcare share programs are often like, instead of paying two grand a month to Blue Cross, you pay the same two grand a month or maybe even a little bit less, you pay maybe a thousand a month into a healthcare share program.

And now if anybody in the community has that $40,000 surgical bill, the group coordinates to get the money paid out to that person who needs it. But I think there's some weird stuff where legally they're not obligated to pay it. It's like a high trust type of situation, but not contractual in the same way that health insurance might be. Although people who have had trouble getting health insurance to pay for things that they think should be covered probably would disagree that that is any more likely to be paid out is probably a fair criticism.

But what's going on here, first of all, health insurance is a whole other thing where I'm like, I don't know if I would touch that. That's very messy. But the majority of these businesses, they're not insurance companies. They are partners with someone else who does it and they get a more tailored plan. So the Knights of Columbus, they just have all the money and the members and then they go to who? Knights of Columbus might be one of the few that does it on their own.

Maybe because they're big enough now. But like AARP, if you know AARP, so AARP does billions of dollars a year in revenue. AARP is Association of Retired People, I think. If you're above 50 or 60, you automatically get a letter from AARP that says, hey, come join AARP. You'll get our magazine, you can come to some of our events, and you'll get a discount on your health insurance. And they partner with United. And so they license their name. So they are the trusted brand and something like the marketing channel, but they do not actually provide the health insurance, but they're a partner.

And so they aren't actually running that. Well, these faith-based businesses are very interesting. So I just did an interview with the guy behind Angel Studios. So Angel is probably the 10th biggest studio in the world. And you've never heard of it. And it's basically all values based content, they call it, which is like one out of every 10 of their movies or TV shows is religious. It'll be like Game of Thrones, but the underlying book is the New Testament. And it's called The Chosen or Chosen, something like that.

It's a show about Jesus. And he said 200 million people have watched that show. It's like on Amazon Prime. It's like one of the most watched shows ever in the history of television is that show. It's on the seventh season. And they helped produce the first three seasons of that. But they make all kinds of movies and shows and their community is basically 3 million members who want content that's going to have no cursing, no drinking, no drugs, stuff like that. And also just heroes, like good people doing good things are in the movie.

So it can't be just like a dark film where everybody's kind of bad, right? Or like everybody's flawed and messed up. And there's just a bunch of messed up people living together, right? They're trying to avoid that type of content. And so for example, they have one movie right now called The Runner. If you watch the trailer for it, it's Owen Wilson and this guy Alan, whatever, Richardson, something like that. And basically the premise of the thing is they're delivering an organ donor, like their organ donor van, they're driving this liver.

And suddenly three cars pull up in front of it and they have guns and they're like, how much does this liver go for on the black market? They're like, a million dollars. And they're like, oh shit, we got to get out of here. I saw that trailer last night in a movie and in my head I was thinking, there's like 18 guys trying to kidnap this body part for only a million dollars. It's crazy. They did so much work for- What kind of margins is this operation running?

Overheads are killing you. That doesn't seem worth it, right? In the movie, they're blowing stuff up. Did you see the cost of ammunition lately? They definitely spent more than a million to get the liver. And so what about it? But this business is a juggernaut. They're doing 400 plus million dollars a year in ARR. What? 450 million in ARR. It's a public company. You can see their data. And the way they did it was they basically said, they had a world view. In fact, the guy who started it, he's this epic marketer who did the marketing behind like Poo-Pourri and Squatty Potty.

He was one of these really viral marketers. You know like Dollar Shave Club? They would make videos like that. Dude, there's a whole Mormon cabal of these really good marketers up there in Salt Lake. All those companies that I think you named are either Mormon based or some affiliation and they're really good at marketing. So this guy's a Latter-day Saint. So what he did was he was tired of looking at YouTube videos where you never know what you're going to get when your kids click on YouTube.

They're two clicks away from watching somebody smoke meth. And so he's like, that's not great. So he created this filter. The project didn't even start as a real business. He literally just took a movie. I think it was like Cinderella Man. It would wipe out all of the cursing, the sex scenes, the drug scenes, but it would leave the rest of the movie. And so he's like, you know, the gluten-free movie, basically. And so he creates this filter and he publishes it, he publishes the movie and immediately gets sued.

And he ends up having to like pay $10 million at a lawsuit somewhere along the way. This tool and these movies started attracting a lot of people. So like 100,000 people eventually wanted the service. They then started doing this thing where you would go rent, technically you would rent the DVD for a dollar. And then that gave his group the permission to wipe out all the scenes and then give you the streaming version of it or something like that. Created this whole loophole to try to make this business work.

And finally said, all right, I'm tired of getting sued by the movie industry because they don't like that we're doing this. Why don't we just make our own movies and our own TV shows that just have out of the box are clean, better for you. Did he raise funding? Yeah, they raised some money. But it's amazing that they've reached this incredible scale. And it's really only like two or three million people. It's not like that many people, but two or three million people each who pay 13 to 20 bucks a month for this streaming service, just like you're paying for Peacock and Paramount and whatever tier two, tier three streamer service that you subscribe to.

And then the members vote on the content. So basically they'll take a movie that's already made and they'll show the trailer or they'll show like a snippet of the movie to the 2 million members and the members vote. And if 70% of less than 70% green light it, the deal is dead no matter what. But if more than 70% say yes, then the movie like kind of gets picked up by them and it's going to go into their marketing pipeline and whatnot. And they have like a higher average, like Rotten Tomatoes and hit rate than all the popular studios.

How did you meet this guy? Ben met him somewhere at a barbecue or something like that and Ben knows that I've been curious about the movie and TV industry and making a movie. And he said, you know, you should talk to this guy. He's done it. You know, he went from no experience in the movie business to now doing almost half a billion dollars a year in revenue for their movie, kind of their like values based A24. Do you know anything? I saw a movie last night.

I went and saw the Chris Hansen movie. You know what that is? Catch a Predator? Yeah. Yeah. He's got a movie? It's about him that he doesn't like. Didn't he get canceled also or something though? I think he was cheating on his wife. I don't think he was a predator, but I don't think he was breaking the law, but I think he was doing not good stuff. That's part of the movie is that he was, while he was doing this, he wasn't like a good husband basically.

And it's called Prime Time. It was pretty great. And it's got Robert Pattinson. It was awesome. It's an A24 movie and every great trailer leading up to the movie was A24. I don't really know anything about A24 other than Scott Belsky, who I have a man crush on was a tech guy, is now working there. Do you know anything about A24? Well, what do you want to know? I know some things about A24, but I'm not an expert. How does someone start a studio? Because it seems like they came out of nowhere.

It seemed like there was a startup at first. And if I remember correctly, their movies early on were kind of dumb or artsy. They weren't mainstream movies, but now it seems like everything they do, I want to see it. One of my business theories is that a great way to think of a business idea is to find the reaction to the action. Like for example, when Facebook was in its absolute prime and everyone was using Facebook, Facebook created this world where all your photos would be public and they would be permanent.

You'd post them on your profile, your timeline, your history, everyone could see them. And so that became the action and the reaction became Snapchat. Photos you could send that would self-destruct in 10 seconds. And it's actually that the popularity of one creates the need for the other. And you see this a lot of times, right? So you, as you know, we talked about GOP ones, as food calories become abundant, you know, you have DoorDash and you have fast food and you have all these, you know, the way that the food industry went, well, then there became a higher, a greater need for the reaction.

And this happens over and over and over again. You see this right now with like screen time limiting apps and Brick and things like that, like things that are getting quite popular that are really just like a reaction to kind of the current norm. And so A24 was also a reaction to the action in a way where the movie studios and the people in Hollywood really started to become extremely conservative and predictable in the movies that they would fund. Because why would you fund an unproven screenplay by this, you know, cool hipster who's drinking matcha when you could just go to Spider-Man 7?

You know, like why, why not? Why not just do Spider-Man again? And so they kept gravitating towards what they call these like four quadrant movies. I don't know if you've seen like the quadrants, have you ever heard this before? No, what are they? It's like males under 30, females under 30, males over 30, females over 30, whatever, a simplified version of that. But it's basically the big short, like if both of us said like, yo, do you like the big shorts? I love the big short.

Well, we love the big short because we're in one of those quadrants and it hits for us. But guess who it doesn't hit for? It doesn't hit for like women over 40 in the same way as it does for, you know, men and their kind of 20 to 40s. And so the highest kind of potential for a film is something that satisfies all four quadrants. You know, Harry Potter right now. It's like if you go, you know, the new HBO series for Harry Potter, they'll put a billion dollars into this because they know that millennials who read it growing up are now 30, 40, 50, you know, 50 years old.

They like it. But so do kids still. And so you're going to get this like huge demographic, the TAM is really large. And so what happened was studios became quite risk averse and they started gravitating towards sequels, superhero films and other things. That created an opportunity for folks like A24 who could go pick up at pretty low cost and pretty uncompetitively all the other films that were being ignored. What are the great films that are being ignored right now? And so what they found was that these independent directors were creating really interesting things that could be produced on a fairly low budget, had pretty low expectations because there was not a lot of demand in Hollywood for their product.

And so they started creating cool, edgy, they're making stuff nobody else was making. So they were like differentiated out of the box. Do you remember the early movies? It looks like it was like the movie The Room, which I saw was pretty awesome. I don't know some of the other earlier ones, though, do you? No. And I'm sure by the way, this is like an extreme oversimplification and somebody who like lives in the movie business is probably like yelling at their phone right now being like, what?

That's not it. That's not the whole story. You're forgetting A, B and C. And I'm sure there's A, B and C. And they did a bunch of things well. They branded their studio well. They have limited edition merch. They figured out a different form of marketing. So like the Timothee Chalamet, where he leaked his movie trailer instead of saying, this summer coming to a movie theater near you, this guy, this guy in the hottest film of the year. It was like a Zoom recording, like a meeting that got accidentally leaked that had a file name that sounded like a real thing.

And it was like an hour long and it was this weird thing that they were doing, you know, that sort of stuff. For example, the guy yesterday was saying they have a movie with Kevin James, you know, like King and Queens, Kevin James. And they were like, he was like to market that movie. Kevin James was like, hey, you know, the character in this, he's like this painter, just like teacher, who's like a painter. So let's just create an Instagram account where I'm a teacher and a painter.

We don't even mention. And people are gonna be like, isn't that Kevin James? But then people will be like, is that just like a Kevin James lookalike? This guy says he lives here and he's just painting every day and he doesn't. What's going on? Let's just do weird shit like that. And then they sent him to the Super Bowl and they bought 12 seats and they left, you know, 10 of them empty. And he sat, you know, 11 of them empty. He sat in the middle of the Super Bowl with empty seats on either side.

He was wearing a tuxedo and he was holding flowers because that's like a famous scene from the movie. And they didn't even explain what was going on and suddenly, but they paid for other influencers to be in the same section because they knew those influencers would be like, dude, that's Kevin James. And why are all those empty seats? Why is he wearing a tuxedo? And why is he holding flowers? They put out their story and it created intrigue and people started wondering what the hell is going on.

And then the movie comes out and it does really well because they can like do this guerrilla marketing that the traditional studios don't really understand or don't have the like DNA to go do. I think A24 and some of the upstarts have figured out that because make it like when you think about the cost of making a movie, it's pretty mind blowing. So he was talking about a movie they made and he goes, yeah, it costs $14 million to make. Okay. How much do you spend on marketing?

$40. So $14 million to make and $40 on marketing. Whoa. So the $14 million, does that include the actor's salary? Everything. Yeah. Okay. Production costs. So it's $54 million all in for this. All in. But this is very common. I was talking to a friend who made a movie and I was like, it had been three or four years since he had first told me about the idea to when it came out and I was like, damn, that's takes forever. But I guess that's just the creative process and he's like, do you know how long filming takes for a movie?

I was like, no. He goes, 30 days, 37 days for us. I was like, you shot the whole thing in 37 days? He goes, yep. End to end, 37 days. And that's complete. I was like, was that fast? He goes, no, that's normal. 30 days. That's how long it normally takes to shoot these things. Is that? Now the editing takes a long time. For a normal movie? Post production. What's that? Like 30 or 60 or 90 days? The actual shooting of the filming of the movie.

Wow, I had no idea. So you spend time writing, getting it funded. That could take years sometimes to get it to day one of principal production. And then afterwards, you have to do all the other mixing, mastering, color correction, all that stuff. That could take time. The edit can take a lot of time. And then you have the marketing and distribution. So the whole thing takes years. The making of the movie, the actual, hey, lights, camera, action, go, say your lines, that thing's like 30 days, which is insane to me.

Same thing with cost. I think the Grand Theft Auto games, they would spend a couple hundred million making the game, years of development and engineering time and animation and all that stuff. But then they would spend equally hundreds of millions on marketing. Maybe not Grand Theft Auto specifically, but for the video game industry, it's very common to do that. So for movies and video games, which are two of the biggest parts of the American economy, they spend more money on marketing than they do on actually making the product, which some people would say is kind of sad, but it's kind of crazy.

Today's podcast is brought to you by my friends at Mercury. They make the world's best banking product. I think you know this already. I use Mercury for all my businesses. I think I have maybe seven or eight businesses. We use Mercury as our business banking across all of them. And now they actually just launched a personal banking account. So I have my personal account there. I moved off of Wells Fargo and Chase. I'm just all in on Mercury. Why? I like products that are easy to use.

I like products that get me and the problems that I have. So like it's very easy to make a joint account with my wife. Very easy to spin up virtual cards. One click and I get savings yield. It just has all the stuff that I need in one place. So if you're looking for the best banking product on the market, it's definitely Mercury. I will fist fight anybody who disagrees with me on that. Go to mercury.com slash personal and learn more. Mercury is a fintech, not an FDIC insured bank.

Banking services are provided through Choice Financial Group and Column NA, members FDIC. This business is foreign to me. We should do a whole episode of like- By the way, seems like a terrible business. He was telling me, he was going, our biggest hit, it did 250 million box office. And it only cost us 14 to make. So then I go, okay, how much was the other cost, like marketing? So that's 40. Okay, so now we're at 54, 250 million in revenue. All right, that's not bad.

You got a five X return. All right, that's the box office. So how much do you keep out of that? Like, what does the theater get? The distributor? He's like, well, 50% because we're big, but much smaller than that if you're kind of a new newcomer. So the 250 becomes 125, 125 against 54 million to create. So your biggest hit in like a hits driven business where you can have lots of flops- Yeah, that profit needs to cover six flops. Is like a two point something X return.

But that's the same way with all creative businesses, that's the case. So for example, Mark Manson, when he came on two or three years ago, he either said this on the podcast or when I was hanging out with him, his book for, I think it was Penguin sold 20 million copies. And he was telling me one time, he was like, yeah, like my mom and dad, like they always kind of gave me a hard time because they thought I was just kind of playing on the computer because I was blogging and then it turned into a book deal and all this stuff.

And I was like, well, when did they start taking you seriously? He was like, well, Penguin put out their annual, I think it was Penguin, I could be getting it wrong, but they put out their annual report because they're owned by News Corp. And he was like, they said that I outsold Hillary Clinton and I helped make the whole company profitable. profitable that year. And I was like, wait, so you were the reason the company was profitable? And basically, with a lot of these publishing businesses, whether it's games or it's movies, it's like one or two things drives everything, and the rest is like, hopefully, it doesn't fail.

Well, that's normal. What was surprising to me was that the one or two things that hit really big, your biggest hit, I would have just expected to be much more than a two-and-a-half X return. I would have thought it's like, in his case, like a book. Yes, you're right. Most books fail. Sure. But when a book hits, like The Subtle Art hit, and you sell 10, 20 million copies, well, that book costs almost nothing to print. And so they're printing money when it hits. And that's what I was surprised at.

Like in startup investing, you get a 50 X, a 100 X, a 200 X, a 1,000 X return when you hit. And I was surprised that the movie business isn't like that, or at least my layman's understanding from a few of his examples and looking at their business. Yeah, and it doesn't seem like it's a fun business to be in right now. I think he explained why, by the way. He goes, have you ever met a billionaire who doesn't want to make a movie? I haven't.

And he said, like, there are every year, let's say, 1,000 films get made. Far less than that get distributed. So even of the films that get made, not just the films that get pitched and written, like screenplays and stuff like that. I think there's some tax advantages there. I get pitched this all the time. And I get these emails and I never actually seriously read them. But isn't there something where if you fund a movie, there's some type of... You can depreciate something weird. But it's not that good.

You can write it off, but the thing has to go into production. So it's not like you could just say you're doing it and get it. You have to actually spend the money. The money has to go into the project and the project has to actually start day one of production. They changed the rules on this. And so it has to actually get made. And if there's no return, well, yeah, you might have saved money in taxes, but you lost your entire principal. You know what I mean?

If you have a million dollars in, maybe you get a 300K write off, but you might lose your million dollars. You'll probably lose your million dollars. I didn't think it was going to take the entire episode to give a shout out to Grindr, by the way. What? Are you wearing a Grindr vest? Dude, they listened to the episode that we had with the former owners of Grindr. Great episode. Did not hit in terms of YouTube. Wonderful episode with Rick Marini when we talked about Grindr and how they turned the business around.

They decided to send me some merch and it's kind of the least gay merch ever. It's an Arctaric vest. I wanted something a little bit more like with some pizzazz. Like a scarf? Yeah, I don't know. Like something. This is way too straight for me. I wanted something a little bit more gay. I thought it'd be more enjoyable. But I appreciate the love, Grindr. I just wish that you'd lean in a little bit. Grindr, where's my puffy vest? This is a hot collab. Grindr MFM. Well, that's it.

That's the pod. All right, let's take a quick break. I want to tell you about Marketing School. It is a podcast that is part of the HubSpot Podcast Network, and it is run by Neil Patel and Eric Soo. These guys are both marketers who are running businesses. So if you want real-world tactics from practitioners who are actually out there in the field doing it, this is the podcast for you. Check it out wherever you get your podcasts.

Go deeper