The Man Who Predicted The Iran War: The Next 9/11 Will Target Your Bank Account! | Professor Jiang

Key Takeaway

Turn abstract geopolitical anxiety into practical resilience: make a one-page household continuity plan today. List emergency contacts, keep copies of key documents, maintain a modest cash-and-essentials buffer, and agree with your family on how you will communicate if payments, internet, or transport are disrupted. The episode’s predictions are highly speculative, but its useful reminder is concrete: fragile systems matter less when your closest relationships, information, and basic preparations are strong.

Episode Overview

Professor Jiang argues that modern prosperity and technological progress depend on a fragile combination of global specialization, trade, U.S. dollar dominance, and military security. He uses this lens to offer highly speculative predictions about geopolitical escalation, financial-system disruption, migration, AI surveillance, and domestic instability. The conversation ends by shifting from macro-level fear to faith, family, truth-telling, and spiritual purpose.

Full Transcript

Transcript of The Man Who Predicted The Iran War: The Next 9/11 Will Target Your Bank Account! | Professor Jiang from Diary of a CEO. Auto-generated from episode audio; may contain minor errors.

Running a small business can feel a lot like being alone at sea, and too often you're not steering the ship yourself. You're getting dragged underneath all of the admin, things like offer letters, onboarding, wages, payroll, filing taxes and health insurance. And that's where our sponsor Gusto helps. They help you break free of all of this clutter and all of this admin work and all of this headache. Gusto is an online payroll and benefits software built for small businesses just like some of you. It's an all-in-one, remote-friendly and incredibly easy-to-use platform, so that you can pay higher onboard and support your team from anywhere in the world.

That way, you can channel all of your energy into growing your business rather than just keeping your head above water, which is a feeling I know very, very well. Try Gusto today at gusto.com slash diary and get three months free when you run your first payroll through Gusto. That's three months of free payroll at gusto.com slash diary. That's gusto.com slash diary. I think there are a lot of people who do not like what I'm saying. I am one of the most polarizing figures in the world right now, but I'm trying to prepare everyone.

And what I want to explain to you today, Stephen, is why the world is collapsing. Because having studied patterns of history and global supply chains, I now recognize and I have a framework to predict the future. And I brought to you three horrifying predictions structured around 9-11. So what are your predictions? I've been dying to know. My first prediction, if there is another 9-11 attack, it will be an attack on the U.S. financial infrastructure. Imagine one day you open your iPhone and you're looking to buy a coffee and all the money in your bank account has been wiped out and they don't know when or how long it will take them to retrieve it.

I believe that's what makes Americans most vulnerable and therefore the most easily traumatized. What's prediction number two? Is that Lionel Messi will become president of Argentina. Oh, wow. I wasn't expecting that. And also, do you think Trump is going to have a third term? Let's take a friendly bet and say $100. Trump gets a third term. There will be a siege of New York City. Prediction three? My third prediction is that... Are you sure? You don't think that the U.S. will actually do that very well?

Well, I understand a lot of this is going to be extremely pessimistic, but we are living in a time of not just war, but also the regression of civilization. We basically hit the height of technological advancement. The word collapse you use there is a strong word. Yes, I am positive that we are seeing the collapse of civilization. All the suffering that we might have seen on television, it is coming to us in our lives. And the world is essentially running out of time. And I will paint a clear and simple picture of what is about to come.

What would have to be the case for none of these sort of catastrophic things to take place? Well, the only thing that gives me hope is... Guys, I've got a favor to ask before this episode begins. The algorithm, if you follow a show, will deliver you the best episodes from that show very prominently in your feed. So when we have our best episodes on the show, the most shared episodes, the most rated episodes, I would love you to know. And the simple way for you to know that is to hit that follow button.

But also, it's the simple, easy, free thing that you can do to help us make the show better. I would be hugely grateful if you could take a minute on the app you're listening to this on right now and hit that follow button. Thank you so, so, so much. Professor Chung, what is front of mind for you at the moment? Your energy is giving me some things on my mind. What is that? I think that we are living in a time when the world is collapsing.

And so what I want to explain to you today, Stephen, is how we got to the world that we are in and why it is collapsing. So first thing I want to explain to you is the petrodollar system, which is a basis for the global economy. So let's go back to the year 1945. And this is the end of World War II. And the United States is dominant. The United States will manufacture goods for Europe and for Japan, which were destroyed in World War II. So what the United States said is, we will lend you the US dollars in order to purchase the goods that we will export to you.

But you have to promise to pay us back in gold. And the United States became complacent. They were spending money they shouldn't have been spending. The United States went from a crown nation to a debtor nation. So in the year 1971, Richard Nixon said that the US dollar would no longer be pegged to the gold. And so the question now was, if the US dollar is no longer pegged to gold, then what is the value of the US dollar? So Richard Nixon had to create demand for the US dollar.

And so three things happened after something called the Nixon shock, 1971 Nixon shock. So the first was the creation of a petrodollar. So Saudi Arabia and other countries in the Middle East agreed to sell their oil only in US dollars. So if you want to buy oil, energy, you need US dollars. Late 70s, early 80s, China said the same thing. If you want our cheap manufactured goods, you have to pay in US dollars. Mid 80s was something called the Placid Accord, where Japan agreed to take all its savings and buy US treasuries.

So it's essentially they're buying a promise from the US? All this is based on promises. The US dollar is a contract. It's a promise. China promises to give you manufactured goods and Saudi Arabia promises to give you oil. This system, the petrodollar system, create the world that we live in today. So let me explain why. So this is a semiconductor. And it's a basis of all technology, of all computer. And there are three critical elements in a semiconductor. Silicon, they are gallium, and they are germanium.

There are many more elements, but these are the three most critical. And these three together allow semiconductors to achieve almost impossible technology. For example, precision missiles, satellite communication, all based on these three elements working together. Why we have these three elements in place is because of this global system. Because silicon is mainly manufactured in China. About 60-70% of the world's silicon comes from China. 70% of gallium comes from China. 90% of the world's germanium comes from China. Now for semiconductors to work, the process is this.

The United States, mainly in California, Nvidia or Apple, they will design very advanced semiconductor chips to power the iPhone, to power your video games. Then the United States will send this chip design over to Taiwan and Malaysia for the manufacture of these chips. The Netherlands and Japan will create machines to print out these semiconductors. So a company in the Netherlands called ASML, they manufacture lithography machines that are worth $400 million each. Then these lithography machines and the chip design go to Taiwan, primarily Taiwan, but also Malaysia as well, in order to manufacture these chips.

And then these chips are then sent to China to be put into appliances. So when you see this semiconductor, you're not just seeing a piece of metal and plastic, you're really seeing the world converging together. So I want you to remember this formula and this will help us explain how the world works. This formula is very simple. Technological progress is correlated with specialization times globalization. This is the formula. So it's very simple. Our technological progress is premised on more countries being able to specialize and these countries being able to trade freely with each other.

And what makes this all possible is global trade that is supported by two things. The first, of course, is the U.S. dollar. The second thing that's most important is the U.S. military hegemony, meaning there are no peer competitor. There is no one who can challenge the United States in control of the seas. So you're coming now to the point of why you think the claim at the top was that the world is collapsing. Exactly. I bring this all up because we need to appreciate what technological innovation is.

If technological innovation is specialization times globalization, then we are living in a time of not just war, but also the regression of civilization. So in other words, my argument to you today is we basically hit the apex, the height of technological advancement. We cannot go any further because in order for technology to progress, you need greater specialization and you need greater globalization. But what we're seeing right now is this war in Iran, it will cause a chain of events that will force all nations to become much more general.

So you will see a decline in specialization and they'll become much more nationalistic. They will need to create self-sufficient supply chains. So you will see a decline in globalization and therefore technology, the progress, will have to decline. The word collapse you use there is a strong word. Yes. Is that the word you meant? That's exactly what I meant. We are living not through World War III. We are not living through a shifting of the global order. We will live through, over the next 20 years, the collapse of civilization itself.

The collapse of civilization itself? Yes. Are you sure? I am positive that we are seeing the collapse of civilization. Give me some definition around the collapse of civilization because people could infer that as, the dollar's not going to be as strong, or they could say, okay, we're not going to innovate as much, or I don't know if your prices are going to go up, but the collapse of civilization. Yes. So let's go back to World War II. In World War II, if you lived in Europe or Asia, it really seemed like the end of the world.

Tens of millions of people died in that war. But at the same time, you had a superpower that was emerging, the United States of America. So at the end of World War II, America was so powerful that it was able, at the end of World War II, to create a new world order and basically finance and defend this new world order called Pax Americana. And we are seeing the last days of Pax Americana. And then you ask yourself, well, then let China emerge, or maybe Russia will emerge, or maybe Israel will emerge to replace Pax Americana.

And unfortunately, what we know is that systems in decline, empires in decline do not go willingly. So the historical analogy I would use is the Bronze Age collapse, because the Bronze Age was very similar to this period in our history when the entire world was globalized. Because in order to make bronze, you needed both copper and tin. And these places were found in different places of the world. And that allowed for global integration. But because of global integration, over time, that led to massive inequality, debt, and polarization.

And so when the system collapsed, the entire world collapsed. So I would argue the closest historical analogy that we have to today is a Bronze Age collapse. What was life like in the Bronze Age collapse? Or how was it different pre-Bronze Age collapse versus post-Bronze Age collapse? So during the Bronze Age collapse, what happened was there was a perfect series of crises that caused systematic collapse. The first was change in weather patterns, climate change, which led to famine, primarily in Europe. We have famine and people are starving.

What do people do? They migrate. They migrate to areas that have food. And this place is primarily going to be Anatolia and Egypt. These migrants overwhelm the systems of Egypt and Anatolia, and this would cause a cascading effect where the entire world lost order. These migrants were called the Sea Peoples, and they were destroying traditional hierarchies and authorities. And once that happened, then the very fundamental elements of civilization disappeared. So if we apply this analogy to today, then I'm going to paint for you a scenario of what might happen.

So we have this war in the Middle East that is only expanding. It's bringing in more and more countries. So as you may know, since we last spoke, Basically, all of Iran's proxies have been brought into the war. This includes the Houthis, which occupies this part of Yemen. The Houthis are a group of military that are in favor of Iran? The Houthis are an ethnic group in Yemen. And Yemen is a country that is divided according to tribes. The thing with the Houthis is, first of all, they live in the mountains, so it's almost impossible to dislodge the Houthis.

Sorry, we've been a tribe for five years. It didn't work. The other thing about the Houthis is they are a Shia tribe people. Now there's Shia Muslim and there's Sunni Muslim. The vast majority of Muslims in the world are Sunni, about 90% of the entire global Muslim population. The Shia are about 10%. And as a result, because they're the minority, the Shia are much more fanatical than the Sunni. And this has always been historically true. They believe in martyrdom. So in other words, the Houthis will fight to the death.

They're not afraid of death. And the third thing about the Houthis that we need to appreciate is they control this critical choke point called the Bab-el-Mandat Strait. This is the Red Sea. So a lot of trade has to go through the Red Sea. Now what we know is Iran has already closed off the Strait of Hormuz. And the easiest and cheapest way for Saudi Arabia to get its oil to East Asia and South Asia is by the sea. So Saudi Arabia cannot actually transport its oil.

So that's the first group that is now involved in this war, the Houthis. Then you have Hezbollah, which is in Lebanon, right here. And they are now fighting Israel. Hezbollah is also a Shia group. So they are also very fanatical. And then you also have Iraq, the Shia militias that are basically their own independent militaries. So all four have been brought into the war. You have Iran, you have the Houthis, you have Hezbollah, you have the Shia militia in Iraq. Why is this important? Because they span the entire Middle East.

And so we are now seeing expansion of the war. And over time, what might happen is more and more nations have been brought into the war to protect their own interests. How is this different from, you know, I grew up with this Iraq war and there was lots of conflict in the Middle East. There was always fighting going on and it feels like it's been a function of my childhood is that the Middle East is always fighting in some capacity somewhere. And, you know, eventually there's a peace in Iraq and the war kind of stops and ISIS is decapitated or whatever, and it just kind of moves around a little bit.

Yeah. Great question. But what's happening today is very different from 2003. In 2003, the United States went in to decapitate Saddam Hussein and his government. And that was easy to do because you had a government that was not very popular amongst the people. So America specializes in shock and awe military tactics. The problem today is you have four different groups. You have the IRGC in Iran. You have the Houthis in Yemen. You have Hezbollah in Lebanon. You have the Shia militia in Iraq. They are decentralized.

They are fanatical and they share a similar eschatology. They share a similar religious framework. And as a result, what we know is the United States military is not very good at fighting guerrilla insurgents. We know because of what happened in Afghanistan, as well as Iran. These two are what is often referred to as forever wars, where the United States spent trillions of dollars over 20 years to try to squash insurgents and they failed miserably. So because these four groups are coordinating, but they're decentralized, this means that this war can only expand over time.

Now Saudi Arabia feels threatened by the Houthis. So what Saudi Arabia has done is most recently it's signed something called the Mecca Accords. Turkey and Pakistan. So Turkey and Pakistan and Saudi Arabia now must come to each other's defense. And it seems to me of these three countries, Saudi Arabia will be the first to invoke this mutual defense pact against the Houthis. So you can see a situation where Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia is brought into war to try to dislodge the Houthis. But we know that the Houthis in their mountain retreat are almost invincible.

So this war can only expand and the Houthis in response, what they can do is destroy the energy infrastructure of Saudi Arabia. The Houthis have ballistic missiles. They have drones. Saudi Arabia is this giant lake of gasoline ready to be blown up or lit up by the Houthis at any time. You know, back in the early 2000s, there was the Al-Qaeda, there was ISIS, there was still Hezbollah in Hamas. So how is this different? Because there was lots of military militant groups. Great question. Okay. Why this is different is there is at the core a nation amongst these groups.

So Al-Qaeda, ISIS, they were working separately, but there are three proxies, okay? You have the Houthis, you have the Hezbollah in Lebanon, you have the Shia militia. They all report back to the IRGC in Iran. And here's the kicker. This is really important. Both China and Russia are supporting Iran in this conflict. China is supporting Iran through the Belt and Road Initiative, basically transporting goods to Iran through this corridor. And Russia is supporting Iran through the Caspian Sea. As a result, Iran, in theory, could fight this war indefinitely, okay?

That's one thing that we have to appreciate. There's a clear alliance in place to make sure that Iran and its proxies can withstand this war. The other thing that's really important for us to appreciate is that the Middle East, it is the heart and center of the petrodollar system. It takes all these barrels of oil in the GCC countries and transports them to India, Pakistan, China, Japan, okay? And what then happens is the East Asia takes these barrels of oil, energy, can you put the Merrill Brothers in Japan?

What are these little figurines you're asking me to put in Japan? So this represents Japan's contribution to the global economy. So it takes energy from the Middle East and turns them into manufactured products, consumer electronic products for the world to consume. It makes these in U.S. dollars, and China, Japan, and the GCC all invest their access savings in the United States, which allows the United States to focus on innovation, to create a place like New York City. New York City is also a very specialized area because it basically is the financial center of the world, okay?

So all this is the petrodollar system. As you can see, the system is dependent on free trade, but once the oil stops flowing, then what happens is China, Japan are no longer able to make the manufactured goods they need to export, and the United States loses all these recycled U.S. dollars. So the three biggest buyers of U.S. treasuries, basically the three biggest financiers of the U.S. economy, basically the AI bubble, are Japan, the GCC, and China. So we will see a cascading effect where maybe in a few months' time, the system collapses.

Do you know what, Professor? One of the reasons why I think it's quite hard for, and I'm just going to be completely honest, people can take this as they take it, but it's just me being honest. One of the reasons why it's quite hard to believe that the world is going to collapse and that this is going to be like the Bronze Age Collapse, I was actually reading about the Bronze Age Collapse after you mentioned it, and what I pulled up here says, The late Bronze Age Collapse was a rapid, violent, and widespread societal breakdown that occurred in the eastern Mediterranean between approximately 1200 and 1150 BCE.

Before the collapse, the region was heavily globalized. Major superpowers like the Egyptians, etc., etc., were deeply interconnected through diplomacy, royal marriages, and complex international trade networks. But within a span of just 50 years, almost every significant city in the eastern Mediterranean was destroyed and many were never rebuilt. And there's a map which I'll throw up on the screen which shows this breakdown. Here's my honesty. As a 34-year-old, I have lived a very charmed life as it relates to history and the things that happened in history.

So when we hear these things that the society will break down, there'll be civil collapse, we don't really have a reference point as like Gen Zs and Millennials, really. Our parents and their parents, they have reference points from World War II, etc., and the 1940s, etc., but we don't really have them. So it seems all to be quite, you know, that can't happen to us. Yeah, you're absolutely right. And I think a lot of the issue is the world has been constructed in a way to maintain the privileges of the Western populations.

An example I use is, you say that we've lived a charmed life. Well, if you lived in Iraq, Afghanistan, these places, you do not live a charmed life because the United States came and attacked you for no particular reason, and they destroyed the very infrastructure of your society. Even today, Iraq and Afghanistan are engulfed in political violence and war and political assassinations. You would have never known if you were a child in Iraq or Afghanistan, and even in Africa, you'd have never known peace, stability, and prosperity.

So the inequality in the world is stark, and we in the West have an extreme privilege to be sheltered from a lot of the chaos in the world. In fact, the U.S. empire is designed to ensure the populations never have to suffer the tragedy and suffering of other people. And what I'm trying to say is this U.S. empire is breaking down, and there's nothing that we can do to stop it. So all the suffering that we might have seen on television, it is coming to us in our lives, and we need to be aware of it.

When you say it's coming to us in our lives, what's coming to us in our lives? The same political violence, the same chaos, the same political polarization that has infested the rest of the world. Do you think war is coming to our shores? Because we now live in a post-nuclear bomb era, and that seems to have created, in a weird way, a bit of peace between superpowers. So I'm going to go to the screen, and I'm going to paint you a picture of our global supply chains and what it means for global supply chains to break down using a few maps.

And these maps, I hope, will paint a clear and simple picture of what is about to come. Can I ask you a question before we go to the screen? Have you always been pessimistic about the future? No. When did you become pessimistic about the future? I became very pessimistic about the future after Brexit and the election of Donald Trump. Because I was an immigrant who grew up in a very poor family. My father was a dishwasher, and he was a dishwasher for 30 years before he retired.

We were so poor, we couldn't even afford a car. We never took any vacations. But I worked hard, I got into Yale University, one of the best colleges in the world. And not only that, but I went there on a full scholarship. So from my perspective, the world was perfect. It was a meritocracy. It was a place that rewarded talent and hard work. So I believe that the world was governed by reason, by logic, by science, by truth, by good people. And when Brexit and the election of Donald Trump happened, I was traumatized.

Brexit was the British people turning away from globalization. The election of Donald Trump, from my perspective, was the American rejection of meritocracy, of reason, of truth, of order. And when that happened, it sort of told me what I believed about the world didn't really work. And when those things happened, that forced me to reflect deeply on the world. on why the world was breaking down. And those events led me to today. Because what I'm trying to do is I'm trying to figure out patterns of history, principles of society that allow us to better understand ourselves.

And that's why I drew you this formula. Because traditionally we understood innovation as maybe coming from universities. And having studied history, having studied global supply chains, I now recognize that no, technology just comes from specialization and globalization. And this not only is an analysis of the current world, but it also gives us a framework to predict the future, right? So if in a time of war, specialization and globalization break down, then in theory, technology should break down as well. Okay, and that's what I'm trying to do.

I'm trying to figure out how and why we are where we are today. So you wanted to draw something on the whiteboard? Okay, right. Whoa, what's that on your face? This is my Boncharge face mask. I've been wearing this for some time now. They're a sponsor of the podcast. I put this on for 15, 20 minutes a day. I can sit here in the chair and wear it. Boosts my collagen production, helps with fine line blemishes, my complexion gets better. And then more people listen to the podcast because I look better.

Professional grade equipment in such a small box. It's non-invasive. And having sat here with so many of the world's leading health professionals, there's various things that I repeatedly hear work and some things I'm a bit skeptical about. This is one of the things that almost all of my guests on this show have confirmed works. It is really, really, really effective. And they offer fast, free shipping worldwide with easy returns and exchanges. And you'll also get a one-year warranty on all of their products. And they're HSA and FSA eligible, giving you tax-free savings up to 40%.

And you can get 20% off when you order through my link at bondcharge.com slash DOAC. That's bondcharge.com slash DOAC. The deal applies site-wide. Much of the reason most people haven't posted content or built their personal brand is because it's hard and it's time-consuming and we're all very, very busy. And if you've never posted something before, there's so many factors in your psychology that stop you wanting to post. What people will think of you. Am I doing this right? Is the thing I'm saying absolutely stupid? All of these result in paralysis, which means you don't post and your feed goes bare.

I'm an investor in a company called Stan Store, which you've probably heard me talk about. And what they've been building is this new tool called Stanley that uses AI, looks at your feed, looks at your tone of voice, looks at your history, looks at your best performing posts and tells you what you should post, makes those posts for you. You can also just use it for inspiration. And sometimes what we need when we're thinking about doing a post for our social media channels is inspiration. Building an audience has fundamentally changed my life and I think it could change yours too.

So I'm inviting you to give this new tool a shot and let me know what you think. All you have to do is search coach.stan.store now to get started. So this is a summary of the global supply chain network and we can see how it involves the entire world. You are not able to build semiconductors unless you have a globalized economy. So there's been a lot of talk about China controlling the elements, right? So China manufactures about 70% of the world's silicon and China controls about 70% of rare earths.

What people don't appreciate is it works both ways, okay? So China does export a lot of silicon and rare earths but it also needs to import a lot of helium in order to sustain its semiconductor manufacturing process. The reason why is helium cools the semiconductors in a way to allow it to be manufactured, okay? So helium is a cooling agent. Another thing that people don't appreciate is people think that China has a monopoly on rare earths but America in a place called Spruce Pine, Spruce Pine, North Carolina, this area has monopoly on high quality quartz.

It controls about 90% of the world's high quality quartz which you need in the silicon manufacturing process as well. Okay, so if these nations start to stop trading with each other, technology would cease to progress. Now, something to keep in mind is it's not just semiconductors that are dependent on the global supply chain. Food is also very dependent on the global supply chain. So what we're seeing is a stark contrast between the North and the South. So the North, okay, produces most of the world's fertilizer and the South, okay, primarily Africa, the Middle East and South America, they import a lot of the fertilizer.

This map shows it much more clearly, okay? So ammonia is a very important component of fertilizer. And as you can see, most of the ammonia production plants are actually in the North of the world, Canada, United States, Europe, China, Russia. So the South, the global South is dependent on the North for food. In a time of war, when global supply chains break down, the North might lose access to fancy wireless smartphones. The South will face famine, okay? Why is this important? Because the world is rife with conflict.

The main issue that we will face next 20 years is not oil, it's actually water, all right? So this map that we're seeing right now is actually telling us where the next major geopolitical flashpoints are. So basically, if you see red on the map, it means this place has water scarcity issues. And the red issues tell us exactly where wars will erupt, okay? So even the United States, if you look at the Western part of the United States, they do have water scarcity issues. And actually if you go to the Western United States, Colorado, California, Arizona, these places, they're fighting over the Colorado River because the Colorado River is what supplies most of their water.

You go to the Middle East, and you know that the Middle East, it's almost like a dynamite ready to explode. And what this war will do is aggravate all the tensions in the Middle East. India itself is facing water shortages, which brings it into conflict with China, okay? So this one map, if you can just see it, it basically tells you where the next geopolitical flashpoints will be. It means a place that is most likely to go to war or have conflict or political violence for the next 20 years, okay?

But also here is Northeast Asia, Japan is here, North Korea is here, okay? So that's another major flashpoint. So this is what, over the next 20 years, where war is most likely to break out, okay? But what's important to appreciate is once war breaks out, there are third order effects causing conflict to spread around the world, okay? This is a really important map for us to appreciate as well. This map tells us fertility rates around the world. As you can see, Africa has the world's highest fertility rate followed by the Middle East, okay?

So they're having the most children per couples. That's right. Why is this a problem? Because if you go back to the previous map, this area is also where there is the most geopolitical tension. And so if there are more and more children, young people being born here, they have no choice but to migrate. And where will they migrate? Probably to Europe. And you're like, well, okay, well, then what Europe should do is turtle up. Europe should build walls and prevent these migrants from reaching Europe. But Europe has its own problem, which is the aging crisis, okay?

So look at what's happening where the fastest aging populations are in fact in the most developed nations, including Japan, Europe, and North America. So if you have an aging population, you need to provide cheap healthcare, nursing. What does that mean? It means you have to let in more immigrants in order to surface the aging population. And what will happen then is domestic conflict, where you have more migration into Western societies, which brings them into conflict with the native populations. And therefore it is possible you have civil war as well as political violence and even the possibility of revolution.

Okay? So these maps collectively paint a very grim picture of the world that we're living in. On this page here about immigration causing civil war, political violence, revolution, will it just be the case as we're seeing that these Western societies will increasingly elect right-wing political parties, which is kind of what we're seeing. We're seeing parties in the UK like Reform, Surge. I think there was news yesterday in Germany of the political party there. We're seeing the same in the United States as well. That's a fantastic point.

That's exactly what we're seeing. We're seeing the AFD surge in Germany, MAGA being very dominant in the United States. We're seeing the same surge in Spain. So in theory, what's gonna happen is these countries become much more right-wing and then they block out immigration because that is your main policy platform. And that should stop the civil war. The problem is what do you do about your aging population? Robots. Exactly, right? That's what you would think, but what we're seeing is a breakdown in global supply chains.

10 on copper, right? Which you get from Chile, Peru, China, Australia. These are pretty far away places from Europe and United States, right? You also need lithium, which you get from the lithium triangle. Again, pretty far away. You also need silicon, which is mainly manufactured in China. You need rare earths, which again is really manufactured in China. So you have this huge issue where in theory, you could use robots. But when global supply chain breaks down, you have to figure out the cheapest way to resolve the labor issue.

And the cheapest solution is immigration, right? People, I have to say this, but people are much cheaper and much more expandable than robots. So I know this is a bit scary. I know this is really depressing, okay? But what if the United States were able to win this war in Iran and conduct regime change? Then all our problems are solved, right? Now Iran is under control of the United States and we're back to globalization where oil is able to flow to South Asia, to East Asia, and then they manufacture goods and then recycle their profits into the Asian economy.

And with all this money, AI is able to innovate to a point where we achieve AGI and then we solve all the world's problems, okay? So what happens next with this whole Iran situation? So unfortunately it has now developed its own momentum, all right? So let me explain what is most likely to happen. Okay, so you have Iran and you are now controlling the Strait of Hormuz, right? You have the Houthis and they control the Baal and Mandat Strait. You have Hezbollah, which can threaten the Suez Canal.

You have the Shia militias that can also threaten the Mediterranean, all right? From a game theory perspective, what Iran should do next is take the initiative and disrupt all global trade. And the reason why is the US empire is based on a petrodollar. It's based on global trade. When you disrupt global trade at the same time, there's no way for the United States to respond. How could they disrupt global trade? What they can do is start to attack randomly, okay? So what the Houthis can do is attack Saudi Arabia.

Iraq can attack Israel. Iran can attack the Strait of Hormuz. Hezbollah can attack the Suez Canal, okay? And while you do that is you're creating uncertainty and chaos in the global trade system. Why is that important? Because the global trade system is built on confidence and that's what drives insurance, okay? So if you're an insurance company, you're like, oh my God, these countries are, sorry, these actors are completely out of control. The United States has lost control over the situation. You can no longer insure global shipping.

If you can't insure global shipping, global shipping ceases to work, all right? So this is the madman theory and this is Iran's best play moving forward. The reason why is the United States does not have the military capacity to respond to a coordinated random strike across the Middle East. So is this your prediction? Is this what happens next? I don't wanna. this prediction just because there are lots of factors I do not know, okay? So first of all, I don't know politically what the situation is in Iran.

Certainly the IRGC would want to do this, but there are political factions within Iran who would think this is too provocative and it's possible the entire world would unite against Iran if Iran were to do this. So what is your prediction in terms of Iran and what happens next? My prediction is this will only escalate. How it will escalate, I don't know, okay? But the trump card, to use a pun, for Iran is to start to disrupt global trade. But the United States has a response, and this response is to attack Iran's critical civil infrastructure, which includes desalination plants and power plants.

And this will be worse than using a nuclear weapon on Iran because without power plants, the people in Tehran, a city of about 10 million people, they face starvation because a lot of this food is refrigerated. This is how the war becomes almost civilization destroying. If Iran were to completely disrupt global trade and if the United States were to destroy the power plants of Iran. Obviously that would be horrific and sort of inconceivably horrifying for the people that live in Iran, the innocent people that are caught in the middle of this.

You don't think that the US will actually do that though, right? I think the United States will be forced to do it. You think they'll be forced to do it? Yes. According to game theory, they will be forced to behave like this because we need to appreciate this formula where the more power you have, the less imagination, empathy you have. And so the idea is you don't think killing millions of Iranians is a too heavy a price. It's all worth it if you can maintain the empire.

The hubris leads you to believe that the gods favor you and you ultimately win and triumph in this great struggle. Don't you create a huge migration crisis where people start fleeing from Iran up into Europe because they are starving? Exactly, right? Not just Iran but Africa as well because they've lost access to cheap energy and fertilizer. So you have all this migration into Europe which would overwhelm the European social fabric, which would overwhelm the European state. But unfortunately, this has been happening at a much slower pace ever since 2014 when for whatever reason, the United States chose to destroy Libya and cause a civil war in Syria, which caused millions to migrate into Europe.

And as you remember, the Europeans in the generosity accepted all these migrants, which has led to tremendous social friction and political tension in Europe today. So your prediction here, if we conclude then, is that the US won't win this quote-unquote war in the Middle East because they can't defeat Iran and its proxies. But also your conclusion is that this is going to continue to escalate in the Middle East. Yes, and already what we're seeing are other actors being drawn into the war. So the most recent news is South Korea has authorized a naval contingent to go and try to secure the Strait of Hormuz.

What would you do if you were Donald Trump? I mean, what would I do if I were Donald Trump? I would push all in. I would start attacking power plants in Iran because if I take any half measures, I would just look weak, and I'm only going to create more problems. I would only incentivize Iran and its allies to be more provocative, to be more aggressive. So if I'm Donald Trump and I'm in this situation, I would just push all in. You'd end up killing millions of Iranians, theoretically.

Well, I start this war, right? Then I have to win this war because I can't lose this war. I refuse to lose this war. I mean, again, I understand the concerns, okay? But if you want to understand how these leaders think, this formula gives you the best window into the psychology, which is because they have so much power, they lose the capacity to imagine different possibilities and have empathy for the suffering of the people in the world. Couldn't they just back out? Couldn't Donald Trump just say, do a big press conference where he says, we won this war in Iran, we destroyed their military, their naval bases, it's done, and Iran will no longer have a nuclear weapon?

The entire petrodollar system is premised on two things. The US dollar as the world reserve currency and the aura of inevitability and invincibility of the US military. If they look like they are beatable, then the US as its image is sufficiently tarnished. Right. What are your predictions? I've been dying to know. So I brought to you three predictions. And because we are so close to the anniversary of 9-11 in New York City, I structured these predictions around the anniversary. And so these will be three fun, but horrifying predictions.

Okay. All right. So my prediction number one is, there will be a siege of New York City. All right. So let me explain my logic. I was here last time, and I said that Donald Trump will get a third term. And he's been joking about it. He's been talking a lot about it. He's been social truthing about it. And so let's imagine what happens if Trump gets a third term? Well, you would have a lot of pissed off people, especially in the major cities of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Boston, Chicago, and New York City.

We should probably just pause there because there is a constitutional ban on serving three terms. The primary barrier being the 22nd Amendment, which was ratified in 1951 by Franklin D. Roosevelt, who won four elections. It establishes a strict term limit for the presidency. And the text in this 22nd Amendment explicitly says, no person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice. So how could that happen? Well, let's just say there is a national emergency and the president is forced to suspend the constitution.

Then he could theoretically have his third term. It's also possible that in 2028, he decides to run as the vice president and have his son, Don Jr., run at the top of the ticket. And then once the election is over, then Don Jr. would resign and then Donald Trump would become the president. And there's nothing in the constitution that prevents him from doing that. So there are two possibilities. There isn't anything in the constitution that allows the US president to suspend the constitution in a time of a national emergency.

It's president. So for example, during the American Civil War, Abraham Lincoln was able to suspend habeas corpus, which is a constitutional right in the US constitution. And during World War II, Franklin Delano Roosevelt also did many unconstitutional things. For example, interning the Japanese population in camps. There's nothing the Supreme Court could do against this because a lot of US politics is convention. It's agreed upon norms. But if a US president is like, well, screw these conventions, there's nothing anyone else can do about it. All right.

So let's imagine, okay, just for the sake of this argument, Trump gets a third term. What will happen is these cities that are democratic will be in open revolt, meaning they will refuse to pay taxes to the federal government, but they will also not welcome federal agents into their cities, which creates conflict between local law enforcement and federal law enforcement. And historically, if that were to happen, then the US president usually thinks that he has responsibility to quash this insurrection. And so this would, over time, lead to the siege of New York City, where maybe federal forces, along with possibly militias from other states, possibly red states that favor Trump, they will try to besiege New York City by cutting off the food supply and water supply to New York City.

And this will be a conflict that could go on for years and years. And what year would that take place? 2028? It could happen right after Trump secures his third term. Do you think Trump is going to have a third term? Do you want to bet? Yeah. I think he'll get a third term. How much do you want to bet? Let's take a friendly bet and say a hundred dollars. Do you know what? I haven't said this before, but I actually did have a bet with two random guys on Facebook.

I don't use Facebook, but I did bet with two random guys on Facebook a couple of years ago. They told me that after Donald Trump had lost the election to Joe Biden, they told me that he was going to stay in power. And so I said, there's no way he stays in power. And they said, no, he will. And then they offered me a bet. They said, a thousand pounds each. We bet you he's going to stay in power. They were like queuing on people. And I said, fine.

And they actually did pay me when he came out of power. They transferred me a thousand dollars each. I gave it to charity. So I'm more than happy to make another bet if you want to make a bet. Let's do it. A hundred dollars. A hundred US dollars. You're betting that Trump gets a third term. Yes. I think he'll be in power after 2028. Is that fair? Like, like he'll be in power after 2028. When's the election? Well, the election should be November 4th, 2028, but I didn't say he would win the election.

I just said he'll get a third term. So you're saying that he will refuse to leave office or find another way to remain president beyond the date of the inauguration? Yes. I'm saying that, uh, on January 21, 2029, Trump will still be in the white house. Okay. I'll take that bet. Okay. For everyone's clear. And please do remind me to cash in lads. A hundred dollars. Okay. Yeah. A hundred dollars may not be worth anything at that time, but a hundred dollars. Okay. Okay. All right.

So again, we are just assuming for the sake of argument that Trump is in office in his third term, there'll be political violence, uh, across the United States, primarily in New York city. And if the federal authority is being challenged by a city or local state authority, then the president will take this very seriously and send in forces to quash this insurrection. Maybe other cities will be much more compliant, but New York city has a very charismatic mayor and Zohan Madani and New Yorkers. You don't want to mess with New Yorkers when they get angry, they get really, really angry.

So, uh, so this, I think, uh, is, uh, very likely if Trump gets a third term, there'll be a siege of New York city. He would almost be 83 years old. I mean, we say that, but like the amount of energy he has, right. The fact of the matter is the guy eats cheeseburgers every day. He gives a press conference almost every day. He's always on social media, tweeting out something stupid. For example, he's tweeted out that, you know, all of North America is now the USA.

I'm not sure if you've seen that yet. And he's talking about taking over Canada and Greenland and Cuba. So I don't know where he gets his energy, but he seems really energetic. I'm not sure if you've ever interviewed Obama, Michelle Obama. Okay. But like, if you just looked at the picture of Obama in 2008, he was a really handsome, really young, very vibrant man in 2008. You fast forward eight years and he came out just decrepit. Okay. He, he was, he had aged like at least 20 years in his office.

Donald Trump, for whatever reason, has not aged that much. Had I in fake tan? So there's something really weird about Donald Trump, which is a lot of US journalists in Washington DC have his direct personal cell phone number and they can call him and they will talk for an hour. Like the guy is the president of the United States. And if you are just an average Washington journalist, you can call him and talk to him for an hour a day. There are journalists who go to the White House, interview him and says, like, we try to get, we try to like leave like an hour ago, but he made a stay and talk to him some more.

He wanted us to leave. So I don't know where he gets his energy from, but he's extremely, extremely energetic and he loves that attention. Okay. What's prediction number two? So again, we are approaching the anniversary of 9 11 and there are a lot of people who fear there will be another 9 11 attack on the United States, just because you have a lot of actors that are very angry at the United States and who may want to seek vengeance against the American people. In that case, if there is another 9 11 attack on the United States, I believe it will be an attack on the US financial infrastructure.

Okay. So let me explain my reasoning. What was 9 11? 9 11 was an act committed by terrorists in order to traumatize the population into self-destructive violence. Is that a fair statement? I don't really know. Is that, was that the... So let's parse the statement. 9 11 was an attempt to traumatize the American population into self-destructive violence. What I mean by that is you're taking the symbols of American power, which are like these airplanes, as well as the Twin Towers. These are symbols of American power and the Pentagon and the white house, and you're destroying them.

And for the longest time, American people believe that these are symbols of American invincibility. Our planes are the Pentagon, the Twin Towers, and to see them destroyed like that would traumatize the population. In fact, it did traumatize many, many people. And the idea is you traumatize them into a self-destructive violence, which means like they want vengeance. And so what do they do? They went to the Middle East, fought against the Taliban in Afghanistan, then went to attack Iraq. Then this war spread to Syria, Libya. And we can say that these 20 years of these former wars in the Middle East have been very destructive for the United States.

It's caused a huge fiscal deficit. It's caused the American military to lose a lot of prestige. It's caused a lot of corruption in Washington, D.C. It's been very bad for the United States. All right. So if you're the terrorist and you look at 9-11, you're like, okay, well, I want to do the same thing, which is like, I want to traumatize people into self-destructive violence. How can I do so? Well, I need to traumatize them, right? Me flying planes into the new Twin Towers doesn't do that because we are now used to they've been normalized into this sort of violence.

So how can I induce trauma into people? Well, there are different possibilities you can use, right? So let's do a thought experiment. What would happen if one day you open your iPhone and you're looking to buy a coffee? Well, you scan your iPhone and it doesn't read and you're like, well, there might be a problem with the bag. You call the bag. You can't get food to the bag. And like after hours and hours of frantic anxiety, you finally recognize that there was an attack on critical U.S.

financial data servers. And so all the money in your bank account has been wiped out and they don't know when or how long it will take them to retrieve it. What would you feel? Concerned. I would say you would feel more than concerned. I would say you would feel a lot of anger and anxiety and frustration. That must be hard to do. Surely taking out the financial infrastructure for everybody for a long enough period of time where they start to feel real world consequences. Would you say 9-11 was hard to do?

Yeah. I would say so as well. I can possibly imagine them doing this. So there is certain creativity to these people and I would not rule that out. But I'm just saying if another 9-11 happens, it is possible what we'll see is the destruction of the U.S. financial infrastructure, which would drive millions of people into a mad frenzy. You've worked your entire life to save up $2 million. That $2 million is your retirement. It used to be that working for yourself was a massive, massive risk, but that world has completely changed.

If you've got a business idea that you can't stop thinking about, I think you owe it to yourself to at least try and make it happen. And that is where our show sponsor Shopify comes in. Their smart platform includes everything you need to start selling and get that idea off the ground. They have this drag and drop editor. They have this AI sidekick and helps you. They have analytics and you don't need to be an expert to get going. Shopify is best in class checkout. Make sure that you're getting paid from day one.

It helps more of your customers finish their purchase because their checkout is so efficient and it saves their info for next time. Personalized checkouts like that equal more conversion, equal a faster growing business. Nothing kills that early enthusiasm you have for a new idea than that first initial step to get going, being difficult, complicated or expensive. And you need to save as much time and money so that you can focus all of it on growing your actual business. And that's what Shopify gives you. Head over to Shopify.com slash Bartlett and you can start your free trial right now.

You said to me at the top of the conversation you're having difficulty getting back into the United States recently. Yes. What do you mean by that? So I think there are a lot of people who do not like what I'm saying. I would say I am one of the most polarizing figures in the world right now. So the story is that the Iran war happened in March and it made me famous and I was really afraid that this fame would annoy and frustrate a lot of Americans.

And so I decided that I should not actually go to the United States at this point because it's most likely that I come here and I could be held in detention by customs. I could be deported. And so that time period was extremely scary for me. And I refuse all offers to come United States. There were quite a few people who wanted me to fight United States to be interviewed. So then what happens over the summer the war started to die down. I thought OK let me fly to Canada where my family is and I'm in Toronto and I'm going to try to enter United States by air from Toronto.

So on August 5th I went to the Toronto airport Pearson. It was like 7 o'clock in the morning because I had an early flight to Los Angeles. I told them that I was going to go on the Theo Vaughn show for and I'll be in the United States for two weeks which was all true. So when I'm at customs the immigration officer asked me a lot of questions but I handle all these questions pretty smoothly. Then he asked me do you have a travel letter for your son because my son Chris who is eight years old he's traveling with me and I'm like what is a travel letter.

And again this is like 7 o'clock in the morning so my brain's not working. He's like call your wife like OK. So I try to call my wife. My wife is in the shower. And so then the immigration officers OK. You have to go to secondary to be interrogated to make sure that your son Chris is traveling with you willingly. So we go we go into secondary and it's like 7 o'clock in the morning and my flight's at 830. And we're waiting for like an hour and I'm freaking out because it seems like we'll miss our flight.

And during this hour I'm texting my wife and she's giving me the birth certificate. She's given me all the materials I need to prove that the son that Chris is my son. And then at the very last minute we get called and in a minute I'm able to resolve the issue. And I tell him I'm going to go on the Theo Vaughn show and I'll be there for two weeks. So I'm in the United States and I get caught up from other podcasts to do interviews and I travel around the United States and I forget about the two week promise to the immigration authorities because I'm not sure if you know the law but I'm Canadian.

I'm a Canadian citizen and therefore I don't need a visa to come to the United States. You know if you say I'm coming for two weeks but you stay a month it's usually not an issue. I go back to Toronto and I come back to do this interview and I come back to do this podcast. And so yesterday I am put in yesterday I'm ready. Okay. I have my travel letter. I have my son's birth certificate and I go immigration officer and they still put me in secondary.

But basically I think what happened was I said certain things during my podcast interviews that piss off some really powerful people in the United States. A lot of things that I said were related to something called a clean break memo which you have a clean break memo was published in 1996 and it laid out a plan for how Israel can become the dominant hegemon in the Middle East. It's written by a study group and part of the study group there were two individuals. They were Richard Perle and Douglas Fyfe.

These two would in the George W Bush administration go work in the Pentagon and these two along with Paul Wolfritz were the chief architects of Iraq war. So I named these people and I explained how this war in Iran follows from the clean break memo and the goal is to establish Israel as the regional hegemon. And I think this is what got me into a lot of trouble. Why do you think that got you into a lot of trouble? Because I'm a Canadian. When I come into the country they usually don't bother me.

And so for them to question me I think it was because some top officials basically requested that I be put in secondary every time I come to the United States. And I also believe this because I have a friend Max Blumenthal who is a very good US journalist and he was in Iran covering Khamenei's funeral and in response a social media influencer named Laura Loomer demanded his arrest. And so when Max Blumenthal came into the country and he is a US citizen by the way his devices were confiscated and now Max Blumenthal is suing the Department of Homeland Security for illegally confiscating his devices.

And so I think that we live in a time when unfortunately the empire is in decline and because of hubris and arrogance they are trying to silence their critics rather than accept our constructive criticisms. Okay. So it's a theory. Absolutely. They never told me why I was put in secondary but he hinted at me that every time I come to the United States I will be put into secondary to make sure that I'm coming to the United States for legitimate reasons. Also he hinted at me that it is possible that once my I-984 expires in six months they will not renew it meaning they will not allow me in the country anymore.

I hope I come back to the United States. I have the deepest admiration for the American people. I think that the Americans are the most open and generous people in the world. But at the same time I do appreciate that we are living in very interesting times. Prediction three. Okay. My third prediction is that Lionel Messi will become president of Argentina. Oh wow I wasn't expecting that. Yeah. So I wanted three new predictions that were fun and interesting for us to discuss. So why make this prediction is that Argentina is working very closely with the United States and Israel at this moment.

You are a British citizen so you will appreciate that Argentina has recently demanded the return of the Falklands. And Donald Trump has voiced support to Argentina. So I'm asking myself why are they so concerned about the Falklands. And not only that but if you've been following the news having Malay has become very close with Benjamin Netanyahu. Argentina and Israel have very strong relations. In fact Argentina is welcoming Israeli investment and immigration into Argentina. And apparently if you are an Israeli citizen and you go into Argentina again you can fact check this.

But from what I understand you have immediate access to the health care as well as pension. Which makes absolutely no sense because they're not Argentina citizens. Right. So it seems very much that Argentina is working very close with Israel and the United States. And the reason why I think that Israel and Argentina are working very close together is right now there's almost a civil war in Israel. We in Messiah like Jews who believe this war in the Middle East will usher in the end times and the coming of Messiah and secular Jews who are like these people are insane.

And so the only way to resolve this conflict is by exporting secular Jews elsewhere. And it seems to me Argentina is a very good place to export them. So but then you're like how do you get the people of Argentina to accept this massive immigration into Argentina from Israel because Israel is not very popular in Argentina. I think the best way is to make Lionel Messi the president of Argentina and his popularity will be enough to let all these Israelis into the country. Him as well as the reclaiming of the Falkland Islands right these two things you know the God of Argentina becomes president and Argentina reclaims the Falklands from the British and I apologize to you as a British citizen.

It's OK I like Messi. You also mentioned to me that you think Japan is going to go to war with China or China is going to go to war with Japan. Yes. What makes you think that. Well because every Chinese believes this. Yes. So it's the funniest thing but like for the longest time people believe that China will eventually invade Taiwan. This is what's very commonly accepted in the West. But if you actually go to China no Chinese actually believes this and no Taiwanese actually believes this because this is not the way that China actually goes about its foreign policy does not go and invade other countries or in its most recent history it has not been that aggressive.

The last war that China fought was in Vietnam. This was was in the mid early 80s. OK so this is a long time. But if you go to China today everyone believes that China and Japan will go to war and to appreciate this you have to understand the geography of Southeast Asia. To try to throw something up on the screen. Yeah. OK. So what I want to do is use geography to explain why conflict between China and. Japan is inevitable at this point. Okay. So you have Japan.

Okay. And then you have China. Okay. So the first thing to appreciate is that these are two very different countries. China is a land power that is self-sufficient. Japan is a sea power that is dependent on resources from abroad. So historically, China was probably an agricultural nation. Japan, in order to survive, engaged in piracy. So the Japanese have always been pretty militaristic. They have a very, they had a cyber culture for the longest time. They were always at war with each other. And the Japanese people are extremely resilient and cohesive because the geography of Japan is very unstable.

There's lots of earthquakes. There's a lot of tsunamis. So they have to work together as a people in order to survive. This is important because this war in Iran, it's affecting both China and Japan. China will probably have to de-industrialize, but if Japan doesn't do anything, then it's possible in the next 50 years, Japan cease to exist because not only is Japan dependent on energy and imports and resources from overseas, but as an aging population. It has the most elderly population in the world. So in a time of war, when the United States is no longer able to give you protection, Japan needs to create resource colonies and historically Southeast Asia right here has been the main resource colony of Japan.

If it does not have Southeast Asia, the United States now becomes the main benefactor of Japan. And Japan doesn't want to be in that position because that's what happened in World War II when Japan got most of its energy from the United States. And when the United States embargoed Japan, Japan was forced to declare war on the United States. Okay. So the United States can provide Japan with all its energy needs, but that would make Japan completely subservient. So Japan wants to basically access a resource of Southeast Asia.

There's a problem though, and that problem is called Taiwan. Taiwan is right in the middle of the South China sea. And if China and Taiwan were to reunify, what China could do now is embargo Japan. I'm not saying China will do so, but I'm saying that China has the option of doing so, and Japan sees that as a threat to its existence. In fact, um... When you say embargo, what does embargo mean? Embargo means you blockade. Okay. But if they did this, wouldn't the whole hell would break loose?

You know, Japan are going to attack China, Taiwan, it's going to get messy. It's going to impact trade. I'm not saying that China would embargo Japan, but I'm saying it has the option of doing so. But you are saying that China is going to attack Japan. No, no, no, no. I'm saying there's a conflict between these two nations. Okay. I thought you said it was inevitable. Yes. So let me explain how this would play out. Okay. So Japan sees Taiwan, the Taiwan issue as vital to its national security interests.

And that's what exactly what Prime Minister Takeuchi said a few months ago. And when she made that statement, China overreacted. So before you had millions of tourists from China visiting Japan a year. Now, most of them are not allowed to go to Japan. And it's very likely that China and Japan will have a conflict over Taiwan. Now, the thing to remember is it does not benefit any nation here to a war, because as you point out, all chaos would break out. What you need to do is create leverage to negotiate better terms.

Okay. So what Japan is doing is saying, okay, look, we can't take on China directly. Because China is too powerful. But what we can do is build alliances to possibly challenge. And if we have to embargo China, right? So what Japan is doing is build alliance with the Philippines and Australia and India. And together, these four nations, even the United States, they could, in theory, choose to embargo China. Right. What Japan needs is access to Southeast Asia, because that would be the main source of its resources going into the future.

So that is a scenario being played out. Now, China does not want to come into a conflict with Japan. Why? Because China is seen as the big bad dragon in this area. And if China is seen as too provocative, that would basically incentivize all of Southeast Asia to gang up on China. So you can see alliance between India, Southeast Asia, Taiwan, Philippines, Australia, South Korea, North Korea, Japan versus China. Okay. So the way to resolve this issue is to use a proxy in order to threaten Japan, in order to develop more leverage over Japan in negotiations, right?

And that proxy, of course, is North Korea. So North Korea has the potential to shell South Korea because most of the population of South Korea lives within 20 minutes of North Korea. And so, in theory, North Korea could flatten Seoul in just a day. Okay. Most of North Korean artillery is actually by the border. What North Korea could also do is lobby missiles into the Sea of Japan and rattle off South Korea. Okay. So this is the dynamic being played out where Japan, through its proxies, primarily the Philippines, is challenging Chinese naval dominance in the South China Sea.

And China will use North Korea as a proxy to threaten South Korea and Japan. Over time, as the United States retreats from the Asia-Pacific, this conflict between China and Japan will get worse and worse. And the main reason why is it is in the strategic best interest of the United States to foment as much tension between China and Japan as possible. But it could compromise Taiwan, no? Who cares? The U.S. care about Taiwan. No, it doesn't. I thought that's true. We get all of our semiconductors from.

But what does Trump want to do? He wants Taiwanese to move their semiconductor industry to the United States. And that's already happening where TSMC, the main semiconductor company in Taiwan, it's opened a, I believe it's $20 billion new factory in Arizona. So if there's a conflict between China and Japan, the tension becomes worse and worse. The Taiwanese semiconductor industry would be forced to relocate to the United States, which would be in the best interest of the Americans. You also think that Russia are going to invade the Baltics?

Yeah. OK, so now we'll shift focus and go into Europe. All right. OK, but but is this pretty clear? Yes, it is clear. OK, right now you have NATO or Europe supporting Ukraine in its war against Russia. OK, and most of this war is actually happening in eastern Ukraine, and Russia seems to be winning a lot of territory in eastern Ukraine. But everybody's saying that Ukraine are fighting back really, really well. The reason why is what Ukraine has chosen to do in these past few months, which has changed the contours of the war, is Ukraine is using drones to attack Russia's energy infrastructure.

And just hitting Russia in general is making the people of Russia change their perception. Exactly right. So before this conflict was contained to eastern Ukraine, it didn't affect the people of Russia. In fact, it really was helping the economy of Russia because Russia could still export its oil around the world. Now, Ukraine, what Ukraine is doing is using drones to attack the war refineries of Russia, which is causing economic pain on the Russian people. And this is making Putin increasingly unpopular. OK, so the contour of the war has changed.

So if you're Russia and you're looking at this, you think your enemy is not Ukraine, you think your enemy is NATO Europe. Why? Because Ukraine, the drones are being manufactured in Germany and the UK and other places as well. So in theory, Ukraine could fight this war to infinity because its manufacturing hub is in Europe. Europe is also providing Ukraine with infinite financing as well as intelligence. OK, so if you're Russia, you're like, wait a minute here. Over time, we can't possibly win this war of attrition because we're fighting Europe and Europe's manufacturing capacity is well protected behind the NATO alliance.

So what I need to do is provoke NATO in Europe into coming into Ukraine, basically force them out of their shell. Right. And so what's been happening is Germany and Russia have been in conflict these past few months. In early August, there was a drone attack on Lipzig Airport, Lipzig Airport. And the Germans blame the Russians, and in response, the Germans closed down the Russian consulate in Bonn, as well as remove certain Russians from Germany. Russia is retaliating by closing the German consulate in St. Petersburg.

And the Russian foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, have said, we are in a similar situation to 1941. What happened in 1941? The Germans invaded Russia. OK, so in other words, Russia recognizes that if they just leave Europe alone and just fight this war in Ukraine, they will lose in the end. So they must force and provoke Europe into mass mobilization to defend Ukraine. And one way to do that is by hitting critical manufacturing infrastructure within Europe. Do you think Russia's next move is to attack within NATO, Germany, the UK, etc.?

It has no choice. It has to do this. Can't it just do a deal with Trump? Like, you know, they're trying to do a deal at the moment, aren't they? Jared Kushner is apparently trying to get a deal done between Ukraine and Russia. So in the United States, do you want peace between Europe and Russia, or do you want war between Europe and Russia? Well, from a game theory perspective, you're better off with war. Why? Because if there's war, Russia can't sell its energy overseas. The United States has monopoly over energy now.

This causes global instability, though. If there's a war here, then it's going to impact the US in a big way. Well, then why did the United States invade Iran? Because they thought it would be an overnight Venezuela situation where you decapitate the leadership, everyone rises up, you have a favourable leader in the country that is subservient to you. Great, exactly. And this is exactly how the empire thinks, right? We already use this formula, right? Now, if we apply this formula to Europe's situation, then the thinking is, well, Putin is a paper tiger.

He is very unpopular at home. If we just force this war for another two months, if we continue to attack the energy infrastructure of Russia, then eventually people will rise up and overthrow Putin. Right? The same logic. So, therefore, Trump wants Ukraine to win, or he wants Ukraine to keep doing what they're doing? Well, Trump personally doesn't care, right? Because the more war there is, the more the Europeans are forced to rely on American energy. Okay. So, if you're Putin, what you need to do is force the Europeans into war in Ukraine.

Why? Because there's really only one path to victory in this scenario. The path to victory is to cause instability and violence in Europe. Okay? The idea is, if you force Europe to mass-mobilize, the people would rather overthrow the government than agree to take up arms against Russia. That's a theory, okay? But Russia has exactly one path to victory, and that is to cause as much instability and violence as possible within Europe. And the best way to do that is by forcing the Europeans to mass-mobilize their population.

But for that to happen, what Russia needs to do first is declare total war. What total war means is the mass-mobilization of your society. So, what's important for us to appreciate is, so far, Russia has not declared war on Ukraine. It is a special military operation, which means that Russia is relying on volunteers to fight this war. In a time of total war, Russia could mobilize its adult population, and we estimate there are at least 3 million reservists in Russia ready to be called up to arms.

Mass-mobilization in Russia would force mass-mobilization in Europe. And this is how the war will most likely turn out. Thank you. I mean, I guess the other thing that's, I mean, listen, Professor, there's a, sounds like there's a lot of conflict on the way. There's an acceleration underway. What would have to be true for us to sit here in 2036 and for there not to have been a conflict between China and Japan, for the Iran situation to have cooled off, the Ukraine war is either, you know, where it is now or it's regressed.

It's a clean break memo. That's changed history. So what are you saying specifically? What would have to be the case for none of these sort of catastrophic things to take place? Okay. In the year 1995, okay, this was published in 1996, now you know, came to power in Israel in 1996. In 1995, we lived in a world of neoliberalism, something called the Washington census. And the idea is we have developed a new model of history. If people just traded with each other and consumers just bought goods, we would have peace forever.

Okay. This is what we call neoliberalism, the Washington census. And Bill Clinton was the main proponent of this idea. And in order to achieve this vision for global peace, what he did was promote the Oslo peace process, which sought to create a two-state solution and bring peace in the Middle East, right? The two-state solution is the Palestinians and Israelis agreed to live side by side. And at that time, the main thinking was that once peace happened in the Middle East, once a two-state solution was created, then they would start to trade with each other.

Israel and Palestine, we brought into the GCC and they would be part of the global supply chain. And once prosperity comes to Israel and Palestine, they would have no need to ever hate each other again. This is called the Oslo peace process. Okay. And again, at that time, this was just how policymakers in Washington understood the world, right? It worked in China, it worked in Japan, it worked in Germany. Japan and Germany were these really militant nation-states, but then we allowed them to trade. We allowed their consumers to have air conditioning, SUVs, and now they're just really peaceful people.

So why can't we do the same thing in Israel and Palestine? So what is the clean break theory in a sentence? The clean break theory is this, Netanyahu came into power and basically his argument is we can never, ever trust the Arabs not to hate us. We are Israelis. We have been promised this land by God and the Arabs see us as enemies and whatever we do, they will always hate us. So screw peace, screw compromise, let us become the regional hegemon because that is our manifest destiny.

That is what God told us to do. That is what is written in the Bible. And that's what we were born to do. Okay. And this is something called the clean break memo and the clean break memo had three major pillars that have all been achieved today. Okay. The first pillar is stop the Oslo peace process. Do not give more land to the Palestinians because the Palestinians are animals and the way to treat animals is by getting the crap out of them. Okay. Do not treat them nicely.

They will, um, they will hate you. So wait, are you saying that the way to stop all of the pessimism that we talked about happening is by the clean break theory succeeding? No, no, no, no. What I said was in 1985 there was already a theory in place called neoliberalism that offered a solution to the Israel-Palestine issue that has been plaguing the Middle East for the past few decades. And if they had thought that through, then we would live in a very different time. Okay. So to my question, my question is, and what would have to be the case for this, all the things you've described, the, the, the wars and the conflict not to happen.

Right. What would have happened is the United States had pressured Israel into seeking peace with the Arab nations. Okay. So the U.S. need to get Israel to be friends with the Arab nations. Yes. You force it because Israel is simply dependent on you for technology, for financing, for arms. Israel is the biggest recipient of American foreign policy aid. So just for those that want to know what the clean break theory is, it was, it's called a clean break, a new strategy for securing the realm. It refers to a prominent 1996 policy documented and then prepared for Benjamin Netanyahu by a study group led by American neoconservative strategists.

Did he read this memo? He commissioned this. He commissioned it. Okay. And the key objectives of the clean break are, as you said, the first one, abandoning land for peace, which advocated for moving away from the Oslo Accords framework, shifting to a posture of peace through strength and peace for peace without giving up any territory. Number two, regional dominance. It recommended transcending the Israel-Palestine conflict by focusing on weakening regional adversaries, specifically advocating for the containment or removal of hostile regimes in Iraq and Syria and dismantling the Iraq-Syria-Hezbollah axis.

And lastly, preemptive action. It urged Israel to abandon defensive containment policies in favor of proactive offensive strategies. And that's exactly what Israel is doing today. This is what Israel has done for the past 30 years. It has promoted regime change in Syria, in Iraq. And so the conclusion here is to stop this sort of conflict escalating, they have to reverse course with this strategy. The US needs to contain Israel, yes. But what I'm arguing is it's too late because you've already unleashed the structural forces that will collapse the global trade system, in which case it's every nation for itself.

I mean, you've already created the conditions for Japan and China to go to war. You've already created conditions for Germany and Russia to go to war. It's no longer, you can't put the gene back in the bottle again. What does this mean? You know, a lot of, most of us aren't involved in politics, so we just kind of watch this stuff and we have to sort of figure out what to do with our families and our lives in spite of this sort of craziness that we see in the news and the global conflict and all that stuff.

What is the best advice that you have for the average person? The best advice I can give to the average person is believe in God. So I am a product of the meritocracy. I received the best education in the world, and I feel the best education in the world makes you think the world is materialistic, God doesn't exist. As a result, in my 20s and 30s and 40s, I was a deeply angry, depressed, frustrated person because if God doesn't exist, there's no order and structure to what's going on.

And it's just complete chaos. And there can be no hope or light in chaos. And because I married a wonderful woman who I think is really an angel, because I have like three beautiful children, I do believe there's a plan and a structure and order and reason to the world. And I've come in the past two years, and it's only been recent, okay? It's only been in the past two years when I have a true belief in God. So it's all going to be okay? Yes.

Great. Yes. But you need to believe in God, and you need to focus on your family. Then it will be all right. So don't focus on protesting in the streets or elections or any of those things? If you believe in God, and you focus on your family, sometimes you're compelled to take action. Because I believe in God, I live a life following one simple principle, which is speak the truth. Why am I on your show? Why did I spend the past month going on so many different podcasts?

Because it's important people know the truth. If you really believe in God, if you really focus on your family, you have a personal and moral responsibility to speak the truth. If you know what's going to happen, then speak it. Why are you doing this? What good will it do? It doesn't matter. It's just like your faith in God compels you to live the truth and to speak the truth and to spread the truth. So just because you believe in God doesn't mean, okay, now I believe in God, and now I can just sit back and hide in my room and play computer games all day.

It doesn't mean that. It means if you truly believe in God, and you believe there's a plan, then you have to take action. And you have to participate in the world, because why else would God create you? So why is God letting all of this stuff happen? When I look around the world, I see lots of wars and conflict. Russia, Ukraine, the Middle East, lots of other things breaking out at the moment. Why would God let this happen? What is the path to wisdom? Struggle, pain, failure.

Yeah. Couldn't we just have the wisdom without them? Well, could you? So we've got a lesson to learn. We have many lessons to learn. But if you are truly a spiritual person, you're thankful for this time, because this struggle, this suffering, will allow us to transcend ourselves. Are we here to make a lot of money and drive fast cars? Are we here to learn what it means to be truly human, to learn what love is, to develop a deeper connection with God? I mean, I think we're here, first and foremost, to be truly human.

That means living a life of love, empathy, and imagination. And so we go back to that formula where if you have too much wealth, you have too much fame, you have too much power, it's impossible for you to truly have imagination, empathy, and love. So how do you correct this? Will you create a world of crises? Because in a world of crises, everyone, you and me, we're forced to look deep down and ask ourselves, what is truly important to me? What gives me happiness? What is meaning and purpose in my life?

And I think the answer is, it's my love for the people around me. And that's the answer that we'll all come to. And once we come to this answer, then I think that is the great spiritual awakening that could possibly redeem all of humanity. Professor, what's the most pertinent thing that's front of mind for you at the moment that we haven't talked about? Well, I mean, we did talk about the coming conflict between China and Japan, and I worry a lot about that. What about AI?

We didn't talk about that. And that's kind of overlaid on all of the stories we've talked about because it's to do with robotics, it's energy, it's semiconductors, chips, it's US, China. Yeah, so that's a great question. And so if we go back and talk about global supply chains, this formula is very important to understand. Technology equals specialization times globalization. So in a time when global supply chains are breaking down, in time of war, AI cannot make that leap into AGI. So what will happen is AI will be repurposed as a control grid rather than AI developing the intelligence necessary to reduce scarcity, to solve the most pressing medical problems of humanity, to solve climate change.

AI will be repurposed to monitor and surveil all of us. I think that's going to happen irrespective of, you know, I think governments are going to be increasingly interested in and capable of monitoring all of us all the time. Because we have cameras, we're here in New York City at the moment, there's cameras everywhere. They're just a little bit dumb. They don't really talk to each other. Yep. With AI, they can all talk to each other. That's right. Professor's walking down the street and he's off his way to this hotel and now he's in a hotel.

I agree that is the most likely trend. But what I'm saying is all these crises will accelerate this trend. Because let's just say you have a siege of New York City. Well, Palantir will use this opportunity to develop autonomous drone warfare that is controlled by AI. So is that your big concern with AI is surveillance? That's not the big risk I see. The big risk I see is how AI can cheapen the human experience. How AI is almost dehumanizing. Because what people like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel and Sam Ullman are saying is computers are so much smarter than us.

And it could be true that AI will eventually be able to do mathematics, do medical diagnostics much more efficiently than we are. But ultimately, we as humans, we're here to love, imagine, and be kind to other people. And that is what the human experience is. And if we focus too much on AI, that diverts and distracts us from our true mission, which is one of spiritual growth. Our true mission is spiritual growth. What gives you hope? Well, the only thing that gives me hope are my children.

You met Chris, but I'm here because of Chris. Chris, honestly, if I didn't have children, first of all, I don't think I would be this successful because I wouldn't have much purpose and meaning in my life. But honestly, at the same time, I think that while children, and I was suddenly this famous, I would become very corrupted very fast. I would just focus on the fame. I would try to make as much money as possible because while children, the only purpose in life is competition against others, to prove that I am materially more successful than other people.

And so I would just try to make as much money as possible for myself in my 15 minutes of fame. But now that I have children, I'm much more concerned about building a legacy for them and setting a good example. Are you worried about Chris's future? I'm not. You're not? I'm not worried about his future. Why? Because my wife and I have loved him to the best of our ability. And the fact that we love him gives him the confidence to live his life to the fullest.

We see every day Chris as a gift from God. But if the world is collapsing, in your words, and Chris is in that world. Yeah. Are you not concerned? I'm not at all concerned. Because we are here in order to have a spiritual awakening. And all the crises, they will induce deep reflection in order for us to fulfill our purpose. I don't know why Chris is here. When Chris was two years old, he literally told us, mom, dad, I'm from another world. And he named that world.

And I'm just an alien visiting you guys. And my wife and I, we weren't surprised. We're like, we knew this. Yeah. We knew you were an alien. We knew you came from another world. We knew that you came here to experience humanity for all our faults and for all our problems. And we see you, we love you, but we will do whatever we can to empower you on your mission. And we're going to try our best because ultimately it's your life, it's your mission. And we cannot ever control you.

Love is about trust. Love is about liberation, liberation from your own anxieties and liberation from the need to control others. First, we have a closing tradition where the last guest leaves a question for the next, not knowing who they're leaving it for. The question left for you is what is your biggest challenge and how are you working on fixing it? My biggest challenge is my fear, my doubt, my paralysis. I went to US border yesterday and now I'm afraid that I will never be allowed back in the United States after I leave.

I'm afraid that I might get banned from a lot of countries because all I do is talk trash about different countries. I've talked trash about China. I've talked trash about Canada. I've talked trash about the United States. If I get banned from all three countries, I'd be in a lot of trouble. My constant challenge is to maintain my faith in God, maintain my faith in my family, maintain my faith in my purpose. I hope you do and you have a wonderful son. He's so curious is the vibe that I got from him.

He's a gift from God. Very, very curious. I just met him in the green room then and he was playing with some Play-Doh and lots of toys and stuff like that. I'm not surprised that he is your son from the 15 seconds I spent with him because he's very, very curious and clearly gonna be a very smart young man. So congratulations. Thank you. At QVC, shopping is more than just checking out. It's discovering something new every day. Start with today's special value. Then explore exciting finds across the brands and categories you love.

From beauty and fashion to home, culinary, and outdoor living. Shop now at qvc.com.