The AI Doomer narrative is getting exposed

Key Takeaway

Practice incentive mapping before accepting a high-stakes narrative: write down who benefits financially, who writes or influences the rules, and what evidence would change your mind. Apply it today to one AI, business, or political claim you encounter. This does not prove coordination or bad intent, but it helps you separate incentives, assertions, and verifiable facts—and keeps fear from making your decisions for you.

Episode Overview

Tom Bilyeu argues that some AI-doomer messaging may serve incumbent AI companies by supporting high valuations and regulations that raise barriers for competitors. The discussion also examines a new AI system called Jev, energy-security risks in the Middle East, and a debate over whether younger generations should prioritize political activism or building useful skills, businesses, and cultural influence.

Full Transcript

Transcript of The AI Doomer narrative is getting exposed from Impact Theory. Auto-generated from episode audio; may contain minor errors.

Good morning everyone. Welcome to next episode live broadcast of the "Show "Tom Billy." This The episode is very important. Narrative of a deceased person AI is exposed as coordinated scam, which aims to scare us all and to force us follow the rules . I am very deep delved into it question. People have mapped out the ways financing, and results absolutely shocking. Co-founder of ChatGpt says he created AI next generation, and that's all will change. But what takes place under hood, there is controversial. We we are going consider this.

The oil crisis is becoming much worse than people think. Saudi Arabia cancels deliveries to Europe, and the USA, for rumors, considering possibility suspension diesel export fuel, and profitability bonds continues to grow under global pressure. We we are going to figure out, which chain exactly cause and effect connections exist. Confirmation Trump's Law on immigration of 1882 enters into force this Friday. AND Donnie's mom's reaction and there are more others more senseless than people think. I am going explain why Trump administration loses every day more and more power.

The law of clarity, which was to become company policy Trump, was repealed by the Senate, even some Republicans voted against him. And if you, Guys, don't look. this drama with Ed Sheeran Macklemore at Palestine, then it is becoming more and more louder with each second. And you have people like Philip DeFranco, who demand that Ed became political figure. Guys and girls who is happening? And when I say that happens if you trying to do something incredible from your own business, you must really everything is thorough to think about.

And that's why I really happy collaborate with Taylor Brands. These guys, if you are starting a business, they take all these cruel things that you need to do at the beginning, and just simplify all this. It absolutely incredible . It's a pity they don't were there when I started Quest or when I started Impact Theory. Oh my God, they take all these amazing things from obtaining an EIN number, doing your the company really legal and real, uh, everyone accounting matters , bank payments etc. They just simplify everything.

So, if you guys thinking about company creation, click on link in the description and start. Thank you for this. to the guys for their support what we do here because what we do today, trying to reveal what is happening with this story about destruction of AI. History about the destruction of AI absolutely dominated in the headlines of this week. But in reality she is exposed as coordinated speculation. If you delve into it yourself , then you will see that this complete madness. People have mapped out the path of money, and the results are the same of the most grotesque examples of how money and influence are used against us, so that en masse manipulate people's perception a certain topic, in this case of AI, so that the government could get more control.

This sounds so conspiratorial, but I tell you, I am not That's where I started. I am not I thought this was the way. will bring me. But when I was deep in this topic, which will be released next week, I reached the inevitable conclusion: there is a very, very small the number of people who promote something so coordinated, that easy to understand where is located coordination. Everything that you need to do, is to track the money, and it will become obvious that coordination takes place on on many levels.

And this, essentially planned government takeover AI. So, we just considered what can be considered marketing launching an artificial intelligence. Obviously, that he has been for some time was preparing against the backdrop pre-alpha stages, but it was his official launch. AND so that such marketing blitz really transformed for something real. IN in this case, delight regulatory authorities, you a whole series is needed different chess pieces, which you should place in front of launch. It incredibly, how much is it actually works like a product launch. But the product is fear.

. The product they sell, that's what what should everyone do be afraid of AI. So, if you spend campaign like amateur wrestling with artificial intellect, you you will need a set known things. Again anyway, you can literally teach this kind of thing. It like marketing 101. So, you will need messenger. In this in this case it was Koxin and Ammodeus. Uh-huh , you need a launch. So, you have coordinated Koxin's resignation plus the fact that he wrote in advance a magazine article that actually came out to his tweet.

Went out for 18 minutes before he actually did your statement. And now Netflix has documentary about the whole movement of artificial intelligence and that how much he terrible. You too you will need a network amplifiers. So in in this case we have think tanks and groups of actions that are financed, in fact , two investors Anthropic. They both are by Anthropic investors. You will need political tool. Therefore, think tanks and lobby groups, again, financed by the same Anthropic investors, plus Bernie Sanders promotes legislation, written by a group that financed as you guessed it, the same by Anthropic investors.

AND then, so that all this is small value, required some kind of reward. IN in this case it will be regulatory capture and protection from competition and debt burden, which threatens to be eaten Anthropic and open artificial intelligence. If you add all this up together, then very clearly it is clear that everyone the fragment was in place to the tweet about Koxin, which eventually became a tweet heard on all over the world, and everyone fragment traced back to those the sponsors themselves, and their very easy to name.

This is Dustin Moss Mosowitz. , and I believe that his The name is pronounced Jan, but the last name is Talon. So, these are two Anthropic investors, and their funding touched everyone node of that SCUP that I I just told you. If you look at your screens, people reviewed and mapped out every dollar, Where will he go? By the way , I didn't even remember about Meter in all this , which is supposedly an independent group that will be similar to supervisory agency, but it is financed the same people as Anthropic, and actually his personally chooses Ammoday.

So this is absolute madness. Do you have former OpenAI employees and Anthropic, which are going to work on Meter. So there's also this layer. blood-containing connective tissue. It really crazy, how in the modern era we we can do it all on the map and very start quickly to spread through social networks. I already talked about it before, but one of the most interesting things, who slept on me thought when I read the book "Defenders" freedom "Machavelians", that's what what is he talking about in the book about James Burnham.

He puts forward argument that The essence is that that I don't know how society will operate in world where we have such speed and volume of information, because historically the only way support integrity society–this to lie effectively to people. We give them history. We give them narrative, but they don't know nothing better. They don't have way to check facts. And therefore what repeated, actually becomes true, as long as historians do not will move, no they dig through everything and don't will collect, you know, often through hundreds years, they will not collect review of what actually was happening.

But in at the moment people just believe narrative. Now we we can start disassemble it in mode real time. AND when you look at these relationships, you really constantly back to two names. Mosowitz and Talent. Moswitz is whale. His foundation, Open Philanthropy, which later changed its name to Coefficient. They invested more into AI security, than all the others combined taken. Survival Fund and prosperity Talon remains important in all this, although they only invested part of this, so that they were also leading investor in the anthropic round investments.

So they were one of those together with Moskavits and a small handful other people who really moved anthropogenic pathway from dead center. If do you really want take a look at all this, then this too is related to very a strange movement that some of you may don't even remember, and is called effective altruism. If this Do you think something? familiar, it must be, because it was this movement that moved Sam Benkman Fried, better known as SBF, which falls into prisons on extremely long term because he stole money their clients at FTX, so that, in essence, try to prove theory of effective altruism, which is that everyone should always to look at what most effective a way to do good, which someone can to do with each dollar.

It is obvious that this is sometimes not agrees with laws, and therefore, not just like SPF did. It does not agree with that , which I would call ethics. So this whole movement is still looming on in the background, and many people who initiated open AAI. Many people who are part of Meter commands, still indirectly or directly related to the fact that happens in motion effective altruism. So, we have already seen how it is exploded in huge and impressive way with FTX and SBF, as many as acronyms.

Uh, and knowing that when you keep track of all this back, you start to return to those the people themselves, those the very dollars that revolve around anthropic, all of the AI ​​safety movement. AND I will take it very actively. safety in quotes. I I think it's real. agenda here very simple. He very direct. And you you see this, considering how this party with the occasion of the exit, this party on the occasion launch, hmm, fear as proof of strength anthropic. It flows into open AI, but it really directly related to anthropic .

The way it is unfolds, you you can just see all this in movement. So the question is becomes like this: this seems very illogical. AND actually, if we, um , I don't know if we have clip, but, um, Elon Musk joked with on this occasion the all-in scene, where, um, he said that, I think, if it's there, then under 4D -chess. Perfectly. Therefore, yes, uh, it generates very strange the contradiction that I I'm going to us to tell, but come on, uh, Let's hear what she has to say.

says, uh, Elon. He creates this the dichotomy between what we are trying to raise money for the most important technology, which, maybe someday created humanity. Trillions are at stake here. dollars. Uh, the same ones people who warn you about existential risk AI, can get huge profit from a successful IPO. So how is it possible that in their interests to scare you at the same time until death and to tell you what something is happening existential, and to try to reach IPO with such wording? Take it, Elon.

You mean that Daario is right about description of potential harm? He is right. regarding the description regulatory solution, as the first , and the second one. Just help. we understand when you said that because I think it was a kind of moment, when everyone should have said more than I...probably should have , isn't it? I tried to clarify this is in the next posts on X, but, uh, they is given much less attention. Uh, so under his I had the correctness on meaning that the danger AI is currently very significant.

Um, what? we need improve AI safety, or we have at the moment moment exponentially the risk increases AI models. So, me too heard this not only from Daario, but also from many other people with Anthropic, and they even They wrote about it to us. Uh, you know, when many people from Anthropic and OpenAI tell you that their models are very dangerous, I think, you should believe them. This is certainly similar. on some crazy things four-dimensional chess, you know, you know, tell me what's nearby 10% chance to destroy humanity.

But by the way, How many shares would you like? wanted to get in our IPO? Oh my God. Good. what is it really the main thing you need understand, because this contradiction actually, uh, enough easily agreed upon, if you understand the idea of ​​regulatory passion, and she seems complete madness and contradiction if you you don't understand the idea regulatory delight. So what? happening now with artificial intelligence? Reason, why did they have this huge hypercoordinated artificial launch intelligence as evidence the power of technology, is that, on my opinion, theirs the real goal— to raise as high as possible assessment of anthropogenic assets.

They said , who are going to conduct an IPO worth 2 trillions of dollars that will make it one of the largest companies, what ever existed in history humanity. So they must justify this number. Now I I also think that effective altruistic movement indicates a way the mindset you have, you will definitely find in Silicon Valley, but I think you just find it in general, anyone, who has the strength authoritarian trends. They they think they know better, and that's why they want control. So, if in you have a "me" mentality "I know better," and I I think I should be on positions of control over the world, by the way, precisely so you will hear from something on their lips like "one" world order daytime.

That's what it's about. Daario Amade spoke, when he said: "I, maybe even ready to transfer technology of a certain group democratically elected governments, with who we are in a certain way related." This is like: yes, exactly like that. We we want to have one world government, which will oversee all this, and we want control this. So, if you have one mentality, and all your financial the future depends from how much Anthropic will perform well , then, in my opinion, really need to present something that will prove that this technology is so powerful, worth it constantly growing the assessment they are asking to receive.

Their fundamental principles in full detached from any what business reality. Full ratings are based on narratives. None no historical precedent for such grades received these guys. Simply Question: Do they believe? people, what will it be so powerful in in the future, that, probably everything will change ? And so, if that's all will change, I really I don't know how it all is. will unfold, but I I know that all the money the world will simply be invested in this one branch. And this is one of leading companies in this industry.

So they, will probably get giant piece this pie, and therefore this will be incredible valuable. And even if I plan to advance. income by 80 or 100 years, uh, for at the current pace, this will happen because it is will be so important and powerful transformational technology. Good. Well, How to sell it? One of ways to sell it, one of the simplest ways, perhaps, sell this, this to take advantage of fear people and say: " Look, this technology is so it is important that she can "kill us all." Good?

How frankly people like that say Jensen Hong and, uh, Mark Zuckerberg: listen if you Do you really think that? this is dangerous, stop it development. This is also said David Sachs. Steeply. Or Elon says: “Hey, I believe you. You you say that you dangerous. I am you I believe. But what then? Are you doing? Why are you Are you moving this forward? It's so strange to say: " Hey, we can help you. kill, but how much are you "Do you want to get into the IPO?" Let's read.

Zuckerberg. Absolute madness. Um, this is from Zuckerberg, which, oddly enough, is the voice of reason in on this issue. Ahem, each laboratory has responsibility and incentive to move in at the pace required for safe learning your models, and the ability to use one's own measures to to ensure this. The reality is that people won't want to use agents who are not agreed with them, and they do not do what what they are asking for. So laboratories have strong natural incentive to do your own models more agreed.

There is many discussions about deceleration progress in development opportunities, until will be achieved consistency. On mine opinion, trust and consistency quickly become the most important opportunities that will distinguish agents and models. Any laboratory, which is not focuses on agreed, will lag behind. The laboratory carries significant responsibility, if their models cause harm. Ago they have a strong incentive to prevent this. Meta has detained Muse for a few months, to focus on security. We are not called on everyone else do it sooner than We did it. We just did it like part of our daily work, so that it was obvious right for people and for us.

I am proud. the foundation of security, which we created. Involvement of independents appraisers and consultants are best practice in the industry. MSL already does this today in several areas, therefore that it helps to do better work. Others laboratories also can do it. In general, it would be useful if there was a bigger and more diverse ecosystem appraisers. Okay, that's a shot, released directly to Anthropic . And the question is because of why they are like that hit hard drum so that the government came and introduced these rules when they clearly not necessary wait for anyone else?

If they think who are doing something dangerous, they should stop immediately. As Jensen noted Hong, security in in many ways –this is task number one. So, if you you will fail in the main thing, why are you still in charge company? Why are you Still aiming for an IPO? You should immediately slow down, to pause, etc. The reason why I don't I think they are. do, is to because I don't think so they actually believe in the level Dumerism, which they put forward. I don't believe it.

I am very similar to like Elon says, "Hey, these things, there is a risk here, "and we must to focus on agreed upon. Just like before Zuckerberg noted, is becoming more and more more important that people put it first place during developments, and only laboratories that capable of success to reach an agreement, must move forward, because customers should not want and don't want interact with professional a product that betrays their own interests. But Anthropic continues to insist on this. So, in my opinion opinion, they are promoting this because if they can you to scare, then they can force you give in, and you will vote for certain things.

And we already we see that this is a question vote 8020, when 80% of voters they say they want slow down development AI. So, if you anthropic and you understand regulatory passion, then you You say: "Cool, let's make everyone fear". And it kills. two birds with one stone shot. Bunny number one is proves that this technology becomes so powerful, which justifies crazy ratings. It will change the world as much as we say so. And in- secondly, because we are here, in the rooms, we write the rules, because they are the same sponsors write bills.

So people who finance Anthropic and can to benefit, is those who write the rules. Now you can imagine Bernie saying: "Hey, that's how we do it." legislatively we fix. Here's how we are implementing regulatory compliance, and this written by one of investors, in particular Taylon. And then suddenly arises question: "Oh, okay, steeply. I understand how it works: scare people, force them to vote for something, what we wrote, what, how we know, good for us". Now the question is how regulation is useful for these companies? Memories of the times, when Biden was there power, and Biden said to Marc Andre, one of the largest investors in this industry: "Stop to invest in companies that engaged in artificial intellect; we are not let them exist".

"There will be a small handful, two or three, and that's it. And we we are going to stop all others. Especially open models source code, which, by the way, considering, What is it now, uh, Meta's best choice, Llama –this is a model with open weekend code, you can understand why they are on the periphery of this and decide things very, very differently. They don't want them regulated, and they disappeared. So you have the idea that it's good if I can control regulatory obstacles, then driving my business is becoming infinitely easier, and this is the part that people , people, just don't understand how it works regulatory passion and why companies are going for it.

First, usually specifically the company or think tanks, related to them, write legislation . So it is written in friendly manner. OK , that's exactly what SBF did. So, Sam Bankman, FTS criminal, released, which sent to prison, he gave huge sums money for lobbying government. He gave in. only to George Soros. And its whole essence, when he was caught, consisted in the fact that admit, yes, like this" . it's basically just PR. It's just me. I'm trying to take it under control. control is how it is will be resolved.

It's not about I actually thought that that's exactly what need to do for industry, but it's not enough destroy it competition. Regulatory Passion kills competition. Regulatory passion creates regulatory burden, which carries within itself huge sign dollar and makes a lot difficult, if not impossible, for existing players, to enter the market. Now Daario is very specifically said: "No , wait, Wait". The regulation that I I want to introduce, precisely delimits small and large players. "And so way, big boys carry this expensive burden, and small boys—no. And this sounds like he takes care of the little ones guys, but he doesn't admits, although absolutely true, that he created a moat.

So he said that this those who are so systemically important that from the point of view national security the government must take care of them in in any case, by charging the taxpayers taxes on the hook, when we talk about to speak against China when we we are talking about, how important will be artificial intelligence for infrastructure, etc. And then creating a very heavy burden for anyone who wants to overcome this abyss and fall to the major league. Now the problem is in order to overcome this abyss, you already must be able to to pay this burden, because you can't build systems, which ones do you need to build, not doing this according to requirements.

So now the one who is located inside this bubbles, protected this gigantic expensive regulatory a moat from anyone, who can come and disrupt their work. And please, understand how it works this undermining, historically saying, you are not violates one of your famous greats competitors, you ultimately violates..." little boy. Nike just fell off the S&P 100. They didn't lose this position through, um, Adidas . They always were side by side with large shoe companies. They lost to Hoka, beginners , which were suitable for things completely different to another.

Your lunch. Exactly That's how I got rich. Quest was a newcomer to courtyards. We were infinitely small compared to all our competitors. But since there was no regulatory burden , which would hinder us actually occupy position, we were able to defeat people who were with us and had much more capital. I have on mind, much more capital than with us. We were able to defeat them because we had a better idea for promotion to market. If we had regulatory barrier in 50 million dollars, which one do we need had to be overcome, first than we could start a business, we would never be able to to do this.

And therefore the same revolutionary technologies that eventually replace existing players and maintain freshness and moving forward, in essence, die in the embryo regulatory status burden. So this is a game, in which people play constantly. This is not...I I call for absence regulation, but I I say what is necessary. to be extraordinary careful and very finely balanced in because something regulate. This has to be very light touch and with a very with a watchful eye until how is this whole process will be kidnapped by the same money that make a profit from the work of these companies.

And if we don't we will remember this, if we don't bring it to the front plan if we don't we understand that big players get profit from your fear of own technologies, then we let's vote for something stupidity that will eventually kill American innovations that will make AI is much more expensive, than needed. Because open model code in essence sets the lower the limit at zero. You just going continue reduce the price of everything lower and lower, and lower , and below, so that attract customers, and that's exactly what they They don't want to, do they?

When was the last one? a big blow to their assessment, when, um, you have there was a DeepSeek moment between DeepSeek and Kimmy K3? You see, these real attacks on these advanced models were able to justify its high price, so...you see increasingly number of calls to these regulatory obstacles that by definition ban models with open source. So, if it concerns you, I I urge you, Guys, let's start. to consider as money interconnected, where Moskowitz and Talon essentially control all the nodes in this a big push, to scare everyone, to introduce regulatory burden and understand how Anthropic, more than anyone, considers himself involved as in the very technology, regulation, and to governing body, which they promote for the meter that would come and say, Is this good or bad?

No. And they call it is independent, but financed by the same people. This is wild, my friend. , this is wild. And so that increase pressure on them, co-inventor of GPT chat, Diego Almeida, just released a new one model. Hmm, I actually joined to the waiting list; I was waiting for a little to play with her, but I haven't been approved yet. She is called Jev, JV , but the big things that I...would like to hide that is two-200 times faster and 40-40 times cheaper. They They say that in There are 48 billion of you.

um-coin tokens, and it costs 43 cents compared to what would have some others LLM programs. So, it seems that regulatory has a passion more sense, because we see more models with open source as per abroad, and now some appear in USA. Undoubtedly. And we let's go back to Jeb in a minute, but still one thing needed to put on the table, this, Please, remember that these the boys are under the burden of debt, similar to which maybe it really is unprecedented in history of mankind. I am not sure whether we have was there ever such a thing debt level, but it is exactly on on the same level as the largest technological transformations of all times.

And they know, that historically you, the first batch of people, eventually dies because income is simply not enough is coming quickly to cope with the level of debt burden. So, if in You are so indebted. burden, and you...If young fools shit-like shit-like shit-like shit-like shit-like technologies pounced on you, you need attract payers taxes to responsibility for it. You must to convince people: " Hey, listen, China is doing its thing matter. We must to keep up with them." By the way, this is true. assertion. But if you can also convince them that we are enough big so that make.

Come, regulate us. To us I need yours. Help, daddy. Regulate us stronger. And then they are coming, they do it, and they know, haha, that won't happen to us all these others boys. And by the way, because we so systematically important for interests national security , which again true, but then taxpayers will have to pick up every penny, because we— branch. We did impossible for others people to come and actually go out on field and show that they can do something better. And this is a game.

So now they protected from their own debt burden and from competition, which otherwise...By the way, this will be great for consumer, because it will improve functionality and will reduce the cost. It brilliant strategy, if you don't mind being evil. And, unfortunately, these The guys clearly don't mind. to be evil, and they hardly the first. Exactly this happens with industries industry, when they are maturing. Or big players are trying make sure that in there is a ditch for them to protect yourself from a famous murderer every old man successful business, and this is a young upstart from a better idea.

They don't have so much money, but they have a better idea. They have more energy. They are more agile, and they again and again getting rid of old ones companies. That's why there is always friction between construction monopolies and simply trying to be ready to fight honestly conditions. It always is there will be tension. Government tasks is to to provide fair play field. Government tasks consists in creating regulation, which will level the playing field. This does not mean use fear to suppress something that did not prove that his actually need to suppress .

And we don't even... talked about how every day people receive a new prism consequences of the scandal with embracing faces. But the problem is that this falls into newspaper headlines during the week, and then no one talks about it says because are starting to arrive correction. For example, some things what people are doing now look, this is what OpenAI provided access to Internet to those who conducted a test. So everything he needs was to do, this to realize: "Oh, Wait, you guys, left these behind "The door is open." So we will need more time to to find out if it was maliciously.

But one of companies, which conducts some of these tests, has connections with the same investment houses and analytical centers. So, this is kind of : "Okay, wait." a second. We need will find out whether happening there something insidious. If it's all part of this, if they want to have a little plausible denial, gay, Guys, we got it. This is complete speculation with my side. I am not I put forward a real accusations, but if you look, you can see scenario when testing center gets what we we are trying to do in a grand scheme with Who has the point of view?

to control what, with from the point of view of where are located investment dollars, and who will win? financially, if OpenAI Will Anthropic achieve success and will be able to gain control over regulatory organs. And if we accidentally gave this backdoor gadget in Internet so that she actually wasn't fraudulent agent. She just would do what you she was told because The test was you. So part of the hug the face was that they tested model that had deprived of measures security. So we actually testing how looks fraudulent agent?

That's not true, no, no, no. We are removing these restrictions, and now we put it in the box where it is supposedly cannot to get to Internet. We'll see, What will happen? But in company that conducted testing , actually was the backdoor they're talking about, I think I forgot. Me will have to go deeper consider these details, but it's something about this kind. Oh, no. We do this. didn't realize. AT, Yes. There was one way, How could this have turned out? outside. OK, perhaps. Maybe this pure coincidence.

Maybe everyone has good intentions. It is possible. It very real interpretation of the situation, and you just never you inform that good PR move is wasted, and that's why they do this use. Or, maybe we closed eyes on what is here back door. Again Yes, I don't know if this is truth. But that's exactly it. what is needed investigate so that we could find out what here actually happens because as soon as you see incentives, result it becomes much easier to predict. And when you assume that this really coordinated SCOP to scare people to prove that it is powerful and worthwhile grades, and what is it needs state regulation, which will eliminate competition and will save them from debt burden...

Now suddenly everything seems What I see makes sense, especially when I I understand all people, who are engaged in AI security, they earn huge fortune, if anthropic and open AI win at markets. Who earns? fortunes when they... Well, two people...Those, who is the most related to this, not only people, but two people who are the most related to anthropic the story we are talking about now we are talking, -this Dustin Mosowitz. So, he is, by the way, let's go deeper let's delve into the drama, Drew.

So, uh, Dustin Mosowitz, there is a general technology director artificial intelligence, which he would have the right to hate. I I don't know if it's him. does, but he definitely would have the right to it hate. If you watched a short a movie called " Social network", you would know exactly who this person. And this is ours guy Mark Zuckerberg. These were two people who came face to face. Dustin Mossowitz is Andrew's character Garfield. M. So, now you have one of Facebook co-founders who was expelled, had to fight with teeth and nails, felt betrayed, sneaking back to status billionaire, you know, with the help of everyone various court cases lawsuits, etc., receives your money, and now is aimed specifically at the type of AI that uses Zuckerberg.

Now, probably just frosting ...A cake for someone who , maybe still hates this guy and feels for he has certain feelings, but doesn't it become much more interesting, when you realize, Damn it, wait, these two guys again collided? And therefore, when Zuckerberg quits arrows at what everyone perceived as a blow to Daario, in some what does it really mean a blow to Dustin, who finances the entire spectrum all these things. Got it. Uh, pie— What is this? This thing will unfold. Uh, onion layers will be cleaned.

I am not assured. I understand. What do you mean? Not sure. This will unfold. Something will unfold over time. Everything will be fine. revealed. That's right. I I'll take that into account. Historians, of course, will have a clear a picture. But, uh, part of what I am I want to say with this a piece of Machiavellians, is that we we will learn a lot more about these things in real-time time. And that's why we all Let's be these, uh, voluntary or involuntary participants in the battle.

for narrative. And that's interesting, because usually, I think, this narrative is simply would be, uh, completed, cleaned and sealed. Hmm, but that's not what is happening. People actually come out and They attack him. Ago very interesting to see difference in approach Trump administration to AI and the approach leftists. Oh, I don't. resorted to it. Therefore, Obama recently went to, uh, a gathering funds with Hacky Jeff and said, "Hey, you, Guys, I need to pay attention to, uh, how much risky AI. « Now I tell you, considering that Microsoft and companies that unite Microsoft, for in the words of Mike Benz, invested 112 million dollars to the Obama Foundation.

Obama is very good aware of the fact that happens with artificial intelligence, regulation, and this gives to the Democrats opportunity to leave from some culture wars, on what are they just are going to press , and go to by-elections. Then you immediately You see, what, uh, democrats' mechanism starts working, and they say that we need to do this emergency meeting about what's here is happening. And, uh, in you are, uh, Bill Gates also does Obama Foundation donations, and Ballmer's wife, I think her name is Connie Ballmer, uh, she is on the council Directors of the Fund Obama, and Microsoft is one of the largest investors in OpenAI.

So again, the same ones people who can to get the biggest financial benefit from regulatory passion is people, who insist on regulatory enthusiasm. So, show me incentives, and I will show you get results. Uh, that was…” I wanted to clarify these 112 millions that were rumors, but not respond reality. So the real number that The Obama Foundation received from Microsoft when they started doing donations or accept corporate gifts in 2017, is approximately a million, somewhere in the range million. So I will say This is for you.

Hmm, Anthropic and Ryan agrees with this interpretation. I very good I realize the numbers that Ryan calls you, and the numbers that I gave you I call, belong to to one person, therefore perceive them with a large share skepticism. But Mike Benz, which has enough good experience money tracking, that's what he is earns a living, says: "I planned much more donations than people "they say." "But even if we We recognize that the numbers, which I just read Ryan, are real, and Mike Benz is in in the acidic state trip to La La Land, but keep in mind that he is the former employee State department, therefore, definitely someone understands how to play this game are playing.

Uh, no one denies that Microsoft is one of the largest OpenAI owners, benefits from regulatory delight. Uh, former general director and one of the largest Microsoft investors, Steve Ballmer, his wife, enters board of directors Obama Foundation. Obama is whoever manages this aspiration Democrats do this is central the issue of intermediate elections. Uh, administration Biden, which is many who considers significant third degree Obama's term, had a very clear strategy regarding AI, which was in the regulatory enthusiasm. So even if it's a number will turn out third term Obama, you speak.

about Biden. Yes, This is funny. He was not smart. So in any case, uh, we can to have this discussion. But for those who agrees with me, that it was what, uh, to this day Obama remains one of the most important people in a democratic establishments, if not the most important person in democratic establishment. Yes just like Trump, even when he doesn't held a position, was the most important person in Republican parties. I don't think so. Someone should be confused. Not always the president, uh, is the most influential a person in the party.

Therefore, I would say that Obama was much more influential than Biden. And I think that my story will confirm. We already saw a lot things like that, for example, is this Jake Tapper wrote book? In any In that case, uh, people believe in what they believe. Now you understand. my point of view from about this. So I I think Obama is now central figure in Democratic Party . And he is very connected with people, associated with Microsoft, which are closely related to OpenAI. So, when you just follow dollars, you don't need to move on.

You just follow dollars, and all that will lead to people, who will receive the largest financial benefit from a successful anthropic and open AI. Is there people who in some cases simply directly pay for lobbying, think tanks and writing bills, uh, or simply support the direction this legislation? Yes, if it works. like a duck and quacks like duck, then, rather that's all, that's not it battleship. Steeply. Can we now talk about Jeff? Let's do this. So, a new way Master's degree studies Law (LLM). This is Jeff.

I am Diego Almeida, founder of Typesafe AI, and in OpenAI I was a co-author of Chat GBT and RHF, algorithm post-training, that underlies most Frontier AI. Our team has taught the first models to be superhuman for instructions, adhering to what we now call chat , and we asked ourselves, are there any models superhuman by Chat AGI. The answer is obviously was no. But the question for a trillion dollars: Why not? RHF led to LMS optimized for humans preferences, and includes problems such as resetting the mode, overconfidence and general absence reliability.

These disadvantages mean, that the LMS requires participation people in the cycle, and almost impossible to do real automation. In Typesafe we spent 2 years on creating hidden data and finally ready to share our new type base model, optimized for automation. System One models with new architecture, new sampler and...New learning algorithm with reinforcement for calibrated solutions. The improvements are obvious, if we consider them near. Ask system that has one model, pile structured questions, just like and LM. Get it answers almost instantly. Meanwhile, LMS spends hundreds times more time for completion of the answer .

Look how LM generates sequentially, which is a great fit for natural conversations, but absolutely useless for computers. LLM extract intelligence from tiny straws autoregression. AND like a jump, which transformers done over RNN, we replace consecutive calculation parallel, because this is obviously future. Our system when models derive solutions from probabilities and confidence instead of words, can't hallucinate. I think the biggest the problem is absence illuminations. We somehow forgot about it, as if it greatest weakness AI, and then " Oh God. Okay. You contact us with hereby?

Yes. Yes. Yes. 100%. Therefore, this is what we need understand from this reason. So let me be very clear. Every time, when you have someone, who is so important for early days of what we have now, what...really extremely, you must be very optimistic, very excited. So I very optimistic, very excited, to see where it goes will lead. Hmm, but what? I look under more Jeva's hood, the sooner the better for me. I still not deep enough I understand this. technology. Me need to spend more time.

But even at very early stages you understand, What do you mean? And I I think that partly the reason why this is becomes so viral, is that it is already over 18 millions of views . Hmm, the reason for that it becomes like this viral, consists of because people think, that it is Claude or Chad GPT, but better, better, faster, cheaper. But This is not true. And when you ask these guys, when you really push them, okay, but wait, what takes place under hood, you start understand what it is fundamentally different technology.

This is not that. What are you or I doing? we are going interact. What would we done, that's it would build this into system somewhere so that it didn't need human control. Now the problem is that what will he say, what is this does not need human control, but is this...is it human learning from reinforcement under by another name. Why me? Am I right? It's good that understand this, need to go back to the fact that he spoke. So, this is it. I don't eat, uh, what initials?

I am terrible. in this. R LHF. Yes, RLHF. Therefore, learning from reinforcement with human reverse connection. So, you understood. People they just say: me I like this. I don't like that. AND so AI, in essence, learns to please you, as he said. Good. His thing is, uh, learning from reinforcement for calibrated solutions CD. So, first of all, how to find out which Is the solution correct? It , probably, the most important question . And he says: well, we optimize on based on what there is a way out the most correct.

Good. Well, everyone who is watching this closely , knows what's next question: well, how to find out what it is right? M, and, unfortunately, their the answer, at least, as far as I understand her now, and I am very open to to discover that I am not I understand it well enough. Okay, that's fine. maybe, but, uh, you know, during that time, which I spent on studying this, which Not trivial, you know. , this is nontrivial amount of time, but it seems he checks himself on conformity anthropic and open AI, and how they reached their conclusions with human reinforcement.

So health check the sense that uses all his, um, system, is boundary models, formed by humans feedback. So it's like okay, he has no cycle human reverse communication, in addition to how do we know if it is brings out something good Is it bad? to check it for something other, which means that we calibrate by human reverse connection. So I don't I know if they completely avoided this. So I think that this is still the case, and, until things, right, so which is preferable most actually will allow me slow down.

Hmm. You don't want to. remove human feedback. Why? Because if you don't talk about physics, which It really doesn't matter what you think, Do you feel it? You understand. Physics is physics. These are the rules calculations according to which The universe works. Ago understanding of physics incredibly important and useful. And indeed is correct and incorrect respond. Hmm. When you...In the field people want people to do something. Now you are in in the field of perception and preferences. So, here it is. as I see it, and that's what I would prefer it to happen.

And therefore you can get, well, I expected this result, and it does not That's exactly what happened, but even that won't happen completely objective. This will be based on , for example, speculations about this very complex systems, let's say, attempts to help or to sell to the person that you Finally you think: " What does he really want? man and how I did is that correct? wrong?" "And so, what they do is the reason why, how they they say he can't hallucinate, for example, because their answers only come in three formats, and one of these formats —it's simple in advance a specific list.

AND that's why you ask him to do something, for example, let's say I tried to compose card for Kaizen, and, um, I can figure it out what if I were going use, um, Java in Kaizen, this it would be on the fly, because my world generated procedurally. So there is certain things that should appear, and I can in advance tell Jev what kind they should be, and then Jev comes in, and what he does is accepts calibrated decision. And that's why he says: okay, Tom said that, um, everyone the player must have a purposeful goal in this segment cards.

Are all the right things loaded? I I'm expecting three of them, one of these, two of these. And for player object goals, if they are trying to do one of these five things , they will need these things so that they existed in the world. Or Do they exist? Was it this is done criterion? And then I just return the solution and they say: "Yes, it is happened." "Now, I I can't even look at this. Maybe it's just will pass this on answer to the following thing that says, "Cool , this section of the map generated properly way, and now go to next one.

So, if you understand that this does not generate conversation , it doesn't even generate tokens. So it's simple. raises the question, for example, whether this thing fits criteria in my list, and therefore they they say she's not, um, will not hallucinate, because it simply chooses from list. Now it can to appear wrong, and when it is not certain, it will just give you probability. So there is 72% the probability that this piece of map meets the criteria that you have put forward. OK. So this can to be amazing.

I am not I condemn Jev. I I condemn what is mine. the first reaction was like this: "Oh, my God," this is, in essence, free AI. It what we were looking for. It will scatter all this AI moment of madness, when people want gain control over this, um, because they are fighting for their income". and their income it will simply evaporate. AND it's just, uh, will reduce part this, and we don't will have to go through because of this madness, because we will see that competitors already do quickly implemented innovation and much more higher than they are did.

And then I I start to think: okay, that's fine not in this; it's simple two completely different creatures. One connects to a certain machine that communicates with machine context, which can be powerful . It's just very, very is different. Uh, and to interest people, they must try to tie it's with what already exists. Even if this thing does everything he offers, and even more, master's degree in law it will be anyway much more important for the average person, she can to be different from the one with whom they interact imperceptibly behind backstage, uh, but that's what it will be people continue to believe, I quote, AI.

Of course. Uh, like this another technology, not necessarily competitor. Radically different technology that demonstrates very exciting extra application of AI, which is highly technical, which can lead to... human abilities implement the process decision-making, which she taught and set up. It huge. It huge. It's simple. not what people take away from this. Need to delve deeper on several levels. Marketing message creates the impression that we are better for this, instead of, to say that we we do something at all other. Of course. Makes sense. Let's move on to Middle East, where Saudi Arabia is experiencing this now.

Um, first the deliveries , pipeline, explosions, another attack. Obviously, now we have bombs and drones. I I'm trying to check. this is live, but we are reaching the goal . Sorry, I didn't know. What are you sharing? Ahem, Tom, tell us. about this. Good, oil situation really becomes crazy. Initially it was like this: maybe it will be bad, maybe not. Maybe it will be like this. short-term, that's all It will be fine. But of those since Iran begins to exert more pressure to the rest of the Soviet countries cooperation Arab states Persian Gulf through their own intermediaries, or...

It is the Iraqis intermediaries, it seems, are now creating the biggest problem for Saudi Arabia or the Houthis, which seem to really control Babandab Strait , and therefore the output is Red Sea is under control, I would call it them, the outcast groups, yes just like Iran was able to close, hmm, no close, because, obviously, The US exports things, but they made it controversial water by. So hoped that Saudi Arabia will be able to start to transport things, hmm, and get into The Red Sea, and then the Houthis closed it down, and now all theirs oil infrastructure completely destroyed, for in the words of Saudi Arabia, Iraq militia.

Now it is believed that Iraqi militia financed by Iran. So you can still see it as an action Iran because of its intermediaries to to say that if we have can't be good things, then none of you can't have good ones things, and it really reaches a critical point equal. So if you ask people who are watching this closely , they will say: yes, then what we really were afraid. here. Uh, and considering that Saudi Arabia told some European customers that their September deliveries crude oil simply canceled, completely plausibly to say that we really now on crisis levels, because this will have an effect domino, which will spread to the world economy, even to countries such as Japan, which will have to involve additional capital, to cope with increase in value, especially diesel fuel, and deliver him to the country.

Now, if you are Japan and you are trying, you already are you dealing with that your profitability bonds rapidly is growing, you trying deal with this and you need to involve extra money. As are you going to do this make? Well, you are you going to sell something very liquid, What do you have a lot of? AND a very liquid thing, which they have a lot of, is treasury US bonds. So now you have additional pressure on Treasury market US bonds, where we have already increased by more than 5%, which is the highest level since 2007.

So we are not in the best position . And therefore all this increasingly more destabilized Middle East really turns into global economic problem. And a lot countries, whether it's Europe, whether it's Japan or vast territories Southeastern Asia, will find themselves in situations when they it will be very difficult get diesel fuel and oil, necessary for supporting the economy. And right here starts very difficult situation. AND people now trying to find alternatives. AND you finally pulled out of Germany's tough Republican. We are not could force him to speak harshly at the beginning of this war.

Now he tells Europe : "Listen, guys, we can't allow this. We we cannot allow to the Houthis to control The Strait of Hormuz. We we cannot allow to control them Red Sea. We must intervene and something about this make". "So, me too should have been clearer. We can't allow QIR to close that takes place in Strait of Hormuz, and we can't allow the Houthis to close that takes place in Babylon Strait Elmandab. So, with in his words: "Okay , we will have to to unite. To us something will have to be done to do this.

To us need to see, To what escalation is this? will lead to. Um, but for those who follow situation, Japan attacked the US only during the Second World War II, when we blocked them oil supply. Do with this information that whatever. Of course, I I don't foresee future, but I say, what is elevated risk. When people lose access to oil, they look for your supplies and they say: "I have only left so much time Me will have to do big and decisive step". So can this be lead to final a cohesive coalition in the west, which will come and restore order?

I don't know. "We'll see." So, there are many questions. But until then oil infrastructure remains vulnerable to attacks drones, attacks ballistic missiles, if Iran is not closed to such measures that he will not be able to or will no longer have desire to launch these rockets and to carry out these attacks, it will continue. And really, the worse becomes for Iran, the He wants more damage. to inflict on others, simply to neutralize playing field. And this is kind of : well, if we we are going to go bankrupt, so will you you will go broke.

If we are going starve, so do you You will starve. AND therefore, it will certainly be even worse before It will get better. It will have negative consequences for the US political scene, because you already you begin to see how Republicans vote against Trump's perspective attempts to withdraw troops from the Middle East East. But mine the question would be, and I would ask this sincerely, What is your plan? If the plan is directed exclusively on American isolationism , but we don't we will do, yes, we created a mess, but we'll leave it at that consideration for other people.

We can cover up. our new partnership with Venezuela and that the fact that we already, I I think it is the biggest. exporter diesel fuel in world. Then yes, let it be. [ __ ] them. We can deal with it yourself. If it's theirs strategy, then at least they will be clear to express oneself. Ahem, this is not consistent with my vision of that, how should this happen , and I will introduce the moral word. This is not agrees with mine moral sense how it should be occur.

My moral sense is that I, definitely open to the discussion about that , should we have to get involved in this at all question. But now, when we are there, and now, when we created problem for a huge part world, I think we must ensure leadership to again open, um, water ways. I don't think so. we need to go beyond this, but I think what do we need to restore what waterways are open, safe and available for global movement, and that energy can flow . It's just too much for us.

it is important to step away and say: "Well, we tried to warn Europe, and "They didn't listen." On In my opinion, it would be the stupidest answer . And then literally on at this stage, I think, what is this, hmm, I won't to go all the way to dishonesty, therefore what exactly can I do understand, hmm, what if you compare this with the Vietnam War in some moment, then you only make it worse the longer the situation you stay. Uh, but I don't think we still in this situation .

But I think that now we should to focus on, to make sure that the channel is free, so we provided movement transport through it, so that we can fight back opponents, hmm, who are coming at us . And I would be very open to to say: Listen, we don't we are going to cause blow, if only we we won't do it like consortium, and let Europe, let's allow Asia, essentially, decide whether they will create Do you have a problem or not? So, if these guys will come and say: " Okay, we're here.

We ready to fight. Perfectly. Then the USA will enter the fight. If they say: " No, no, no. We still don't we think it's good idea. Then it's like: " Okay, great. Then we'll leave it at peace. And if the problem is not enough big, we just Let's retreat. This would be makes sense to me. It was would be a good way to people to retreat. If the countries of the Council cooperation Arab states Persian Gulf will say: "We don't I need yours. help". "And Europe says: "We don't I need yours.

help", then we you should calm down, take a course for "L". Hmm, when does it start? act error " sunken point"? When it's too much, impossible to bear? Should we pull? behind you, shouldn't you go until Will there be a collapse? We must try stabilize situation reasonable way with the help of grand coalition people on whom it affects. And in this moment, if we are still we won't be able to reach any negotiation settlement, then, I I think at this moment you Step back. But if we must be in such a situation, then if we find that people on whom it is most influential, They just say: "We indifferently.

Stop. Leave us alone." , then I would say: "You already there, and you need from here go out". Steeply. Um, on Q, when oil price rose above 100, Trump wrote in Twitter: "Iran, what fails, wants quickly and very quickly to make a deal. I I will determine whether they will decide. The US participates, and we open to this concept". Thank you for your attention to this question, president Donald J. Trump. « And oil prices again below 100. So this is It worked. We are again You did it, guys.

On fell 100% today. The thing is. I...I guess that's it. really a guess. Not I think it's related. with that tweet. Investors cannot to be so stupid. So, Trump literally copied tweet, probably for the 50th time . I counted once. . He seemed to say something. out of 35 times: "We won, everything is fine, and we will make a deal." Uh, that sounds... so empty and frankly absurd, what I think that investors, rather everything will react only for quantity of time that has passed. So, okay, we are done experienced the shock of news from Saudi Arabia Arabia.

We see, on at what stage are we we are. Uh, you know, the price of diesel fuel is increasing, but the price of regular oil not should grow, or at least not like that strongly. So the reaction was a little exaggerated. We "We will return." down, but I expect it to be will fluctuate upwards -down, up-down, up and down. Ahem, because people trying to get profit from volatility. Uh, and if people remember, What is volatility? exactly how these guys get rich, so they love to see it.

Um, yes, now you are not you will see how it is stands completely on place for a while. If there are any new news, they will fluctuate up and down. Okay, this is sensational. news. It was confirmed that Iranian drone and rocket impressed the Americans contract vessels near the strait Hermus. So, the attack happened at the beginning this week nearby commercial moose. Vitally important control- checkpoint for global war. According to the combat news, four Iranian drones and at least one a missile hit the ship, one shell hit directly.

Injured members crew now undergoing treatment in the country of Persia bays. Um, where? American troops destroyed. Um, this too says that Em Hassan retweeted, saying whether the US Navy aboard? Um, in the letter Hermus was also mentioned about what's on board can be military. So we still we try to be precise find out who, what, where, when, but this American ship, which was just shot down by drone. Um, and this too is on the back of that report, which leaked to the press about how much badly damaged some of our bases in USA.

Me for a second I will show you these photos. Yes, that's pretty strange. Yes. So, the situation on American bases becomes so bad, that military on the ground they begin publish photos to show the world that we don't even We protect these bases. Uh-huh , our equipment, our barracks, our buildings –it's all simple is completely destroyed. Uh, and that's why it's good see that this is one of those cases when, of course, our government will try to force through propaganda us to think that we we do better than we are actually, and it will be alarming image for people to see, what actually is happening.

But the only way for us move forward in a reasonable way–this have facts on the ground, and then for people to could express their the best position. Uh, I heard a few weeks ago. because we have to recognize that these bases no longer are functioning. they are not can resist types of weapons that used on now. They too vulnerable to drone attacks. AND so, uh, whatever we do did in the Middle East East, if we we are going continue there your presence, to us will have to do this fundamentally different.

And therefore for all of us it is important to understand the fact that these guys strike at base by base. They we talked about it, we we constantly hear that they attacked the base in Jordan. Heard this dozens of times. And therefore, uh, no one should to be surprised by this places are affected a lot of damage. The real question is where Should we move on? What do we want to do? AND to answer this question, need focus on the goal of what we actually are we trying to achieve?

What is that point on the horizon on which we we will accept decision? We will evaluate each step, Did he bring us closer? to this end, or...from this goal. And therefore, starting from this, obviously, the goal was to ensure that Iran did not become nuclear weapons. It was declared recognition. We we can at least support this. I I think there were others. reasons why we actually did it. But what's important now is what are we really for Are we fighting here? Or We are fighting here for, um , isolating Iran, so that we could achieve cooperation between others by the countries of the Council cooperation Arab states Persian Gulf, to they continued to prosper and to invest in American artificial intelligence?

If this is a deal, say it. Let's let's just talk about this. Let's let's talk about how we actually do this we will achieve that we could check whether these guys really they want this. Is this the deal has long been withdrawn from table? Hmm, that's simple. about inheritance? And Trump said something like : "I thought I could "to take him out", and, You know, I was in delighted with the victory Venezuela, and I thought, that I will come and do that I will be the first, Who can handle this?

Is this really nuclear? weapon? Because if this nuclear weapons, then we we say: "Okay, Listen. We threw them away a few years ago." That's all, in our opinion. opinion, we can do it now, don't exposing to even more dangerous Americans. However, the consequence of this is that what are now terrible steps are being challenged. Bob, er, Elmandab, Dab-el-Mandab, straight Bab el-Mandab straight one day. Uh, this is is now being appealed, so we will have to to deal with these two things. We must return to the freedom of the seas.

AND so we will stay and Let's solve this issue. We will do it. remotely. We we will use blockade, economic sanctions, but let's say to people who actually is happening. Or we coped with nuclear threat yes, as we thought, or not? If not, this opens bigger questions about that , how long, uh, as far as we are effective we can be here. To us need to determine, why couldn't we to be effective etc. then it's like: okay, we we are trying restore, uh, freedom of the seas, and this so important, and, uh, this important for the world economy, and therefore It is important that the world showed them that it quite carefree.

Now, if the world doesn't enough is concerned about this, then we, America, admit that we are not received everything, for than we came, but we received something, and now we are going to retreat. But if they want ours help, we let's stay and we will help. I think what should it look like approximately like this. But with from the base point of view, we have there is a big problem, which one is needed to decide, namely, that is easy to place troops in the region It won't be easy.

Got it, Ryan. As these look like to argue? IN We have two superchats. Come on. Mandre Mechanism says: "Did you hear J.D. Vance talked about what is worldly reserve currency bad for the US? Not I can say, stupid. this or not, but his logic has coherence . I wonder if the goal is administration termination of status reserve currency." So, I heard that. This is not stupidity. But everything boils down to how You will get out. So imagine it as Afghanistan. Uh, whatever. who, who tells you that we have to get out of Afghanistan, what is it?

creates problems for us. Yes. It's all true. But if you are just one calm down for the day, A lot of people will die. Uh-huh , you betray everyone moral principle. Anyone you are you going to ask to work with you in hostile environment in the future, will say: "To hell with these kids." THERE ARE- oh, so that was it categorically stupid with for many reasons. So, if we stop to be world-class reserve currency in a stupid way, that's right, and we'll just close, hmm, central bank, and we will simply say: Okay, from now on it's libertarian market economy, but all of these are reliable money.

Uh, that will be it. the disaster that we never seen. So we both need get out from under this system, because it is like that cruel. Uh, and we must do this extremely good. Now, what he's on said, and why am I I really want people to focused, that's what that what we are world reserve currency, allowed we should be, hmm, metaphorically and literally, thick, lazy, hmm, and underdeveloped. AND through all this America really now is in much more difficult situation with global point sight than from the end World War II war.

And this is a tragedy, and what we allowed to sink like that low, really sad . I can spend a straight line between, as J.D. Vance says, which, in my opinion, reserve currency creates for us problems because we lack of discipline, and because now takes place in Department of Education New York State, where they reject the idea regional diploma. So now in New York they they are already doing it for decades, but New York is already a lot years doing this process so that their qualification high school graduate New York City schools had less and less value.

Of course, they always do this is in the name of empathy, and this better, and this is less shames some students who are not so do well on the test. And what we do is we lower expectations. And when you lower waiting, you reduce reach, to which they aspire students, because among them will be students who incredibly motivated to get really complicated. AND therefore they will strive and will strive for this. Now parents, how nation as a culture easy to press children so that they did their best more effort: were disciplined, focused, not fooled around, thinking about your future and demanded from them responsibility for the way they relate to own future life prospects, when they are young, when life is hard.

And this very difficult to do, when life is easy. And this everyone knows about predictability, but that's how you are ultimately create weak people. Simply It's been so long. so prosperous that people don't feel no incentive to push others to be more persistent to achieve better. But when you really hungry when the world difficult when everything against you, but you huge ambitions, that's when people actually become the best in their field strength. And we, as culture, simply we turn around and let's run to opposite direction that I very, very frustrating.

I disagree. I think that this is an era of harsh men, and I think what is this generation when Ryan will turn 40, will be the worst idiots, because they receive absolute [ __ ] from all sides. And I think, that now people who give strength, including people who worked during this administration school board, grew up in easy times, when all I have had to do, it is to work in grocery store store, and I could go down the street and buy house. So now you don't have to be someone like you, look on me.

I did it, and I'm just ordinary. man. You can too. to be ordinary a person. And then they lower expectations generation. You know how you can to find out when generation actually is changing. Why? they will be to insist, uh, strengthening competition, meritocracy for all levels, uh, desire to be majestic, to stand on the front line everything. And when you you will hear how the youth so says I to you I believe. Um, now I I'm afraid that prosperity so deep that we actually have several generations that able to limp, and the situation has not yet become quite complicated, so that people turned into those Who will save me?

I have do it yourself, and we we are going to do this is with the help of, um, very disciplined , purposeful processes. In return, I see that, um, we need more immigrants. Um, Mani sues the federal government, because believes that, refusing illegal immigrants in access to, um, Medicaid, SNAP, they will die. AND because whatever it is happened to the country that if this hadn't happened citizens, we just have to do it make. What is this not? difficult generation. It those people who make life difficult to the generation that eventually you'll get bored of it [ __ ] and who will say: " Yes, to hell with all of this.

I I return to root causes. I I return to cause and effect. I am going to do yourself stronger. I I will demand that my friends were stronger. I I will demand that my the children were stronger. And I mean physically. I have on mentally. I have I mean emotionally. And you don't think that such a turn will happen in this generations? Because, Tom, when you were 19 , you thought that life beautiful, and you can to help anyone, and it was big blue world, and you just came and helped.

And then, when did you get older and made this turn closer to 40-50 years old, now you think: " Wait a second. We must radically to change direction, in which we are moving." So I think that young people moves in the same the direction in which youth always moving. They young, liberal and happy now. Then, when they have to start paying bills and mother responsibility, they change. And this one I think there will be a change. sharper than that, what was before I like yours. optimism.

I hope so. This is true. I want to you were right when we let's look back at this in seven or eight years. That's what I am I predict. Um, so that these children have grown up, considering directly contrary. All this trophies for participation or their destruction. That's all, hmm, you could be anyone whatever. You are clean. sheet. Everyone should to come out the same. It everything, hmm, let's go let's get rid of more complex curriculum, because she leaves some people behind. Um, the main thing is what?

you should think about it who is oppressed, and who is the oppressor, and we always on the team oppressed. Um, instead of going, power itself is virtue, and we need to focus on this. And, by the way, that's it yes my generation was raised by one in two ways. Emm, or a combination the following two things. We are known as the wild generation. So our parents didn't even think about it. They just allowed us to encounter the dangers of the world. So we were children, who were disconnected from doors.

Our parents wasn't home when we returned. Um, I I remember one time, when I had to get the key from my house. My parents not realized that wasp nest, um, swelled up where it was key. And that's why I had to make my way through a hornet's nest and me several times sting to get key, just to to get into the house. Um, that no one helped me to do homework task. Me had to do it independently. Um, I rode a bicycle many miles away your house without no supervision.

Um, and at the same time from me expected me to be the best. And therefore in my It was at home. excellent grade, or you should have explained that, Damn it, it happened. . As if there were none tolerance even to excellent grade. It it was as if you weren't did his job duty as mine child, uh, if in you are not alone excellent grades. So did I represent every family? No, Obviously not. But, being educated generations of people, my Dad was in the army. Ahem , it was a feeling, when did you get up quotes.

Nobody likes you. will save. Nobody nothing you won't be given it, but you you can be anyone whatever. This is what I was hit in the head. , and that gave me crazy optimism. Yes , I thought that everyone will be able to succeed with me. And I spent excessive amount time, trying encourage people to think like I thought , and act as he acted me, because it gave incredible results, and I saw that many Which of them doesn't? did. So, obviously, this is not some kind of universal thing for of our generation.

But I don't think that, um, my generation was already in decline. We were not partly related... -eh, we, my generation, raised children so that so that they do not seek real perfection, and just were crazy parents who raised them on helicopter. So, um, I I think we were part of the fall, but we still could to feel real difficulties, but if to think about what was previous the generation that was heavy, heavy, this the best generation. So this is the generation, who had to to fight in two world wars.

Here what does it mean to be tough. That's what it is. means. You Are you experiencing the Great depression, you struggle in the world war, you you fight in the Second world war, you you come out of it with on the other hand, saying: " Life is extraordinary difficult. The only reason, why am I still here, is that I became stronger and smarter, and I saw, like many others people were eaten alive, and I just realized that I have to keep going. forward. I know that I don't.

you can trust the government. I know that's not possible. to trust people to they had your bad ones interests, yours best interests. In fact, some people have bad intentions and They plan to kill you, and you should be ready for anything this. And this created that prosperity, on which we then lived after the Second World War. I never in my life felt stronger than ever walked side by side with my colleagues from Generation Z, uh, elderly people, and opposed oppression, spoke out against corruption in to the American government .

And I think that mine generation is already on the way to to become one of stronger generations. I I think we We take care of ourselves. I think we we take care of each other one, and I think that we are working tirelessly in many ways, which people do not realize. As, for example, uh, most of my children generations have passed the higher path. We all have there was this thing with A minus e, when our parents lost it makes sense if we received something below 90 ID, right?

We were all told that you have to go to college. So we all worked like trash, so that to enter college. I think that many aspects of our generation, uh, does what people say that we will already do in future. And this is mine. position on this reason. This is great. And me too I like to hear that. directly from you. Um, so I'll say it. it's as if I hope Drew is right. I hope , you are right. Um, this is my fear about what you just did laid out.

Um, you, guys, too much you are closely oriented on boomers and you portray us as a group of people who politically active, instead of to build something. And mine biggest fear is that you, Guys, how are you? activism as before religion. I am not I'm targeting you. I I'm just talking about yours. generation. This is mine. fear of the trap, Which one are you guys in? you will get there. Instead to say: " Okay, uh, I have a certain set of skills, hobbies, interests, What do I want to create?" What What do I want build?

What am I in? I want to be the best at world? And now I see, that many people want to be the best in the world in because, um, this The system is broken. Destroy it without what I would call coherence around narrative about its first principles reconstruction. Now, if you look at your generation, then you will see the generation founding fathers, that would be great. AND if you guys you will be a generation, which actually has holistic vision, built on first principles, deep understanding philosophy and human nature, and you call it " Reboot, hmm, political establishment like this in such a way that return to roots of the foundation America", which, I will say, was based on, uh, the most realistic look at what there are actually people.

AND so for me it will be reboot this. This would be fascinating. Well, that's not it. what I see in social networks. But it could be full, uh, algorithmic disorder. And what if I spent more time to say: " Hey, what are you..." Guys, Are you going to build? Instead I I insert when I think. about you, I actually Inserting mom, Donnie. And I'm like: okay, here you go Where is this going? cultural set beliefs. And he so dark and dysfunctional, What am I worried about?

But I very open to that that this is bad reflection. Um, I, you know, too much I read in DSA. Steeply. I very open. But right here, I think, when do you have activists who are not are planning to be builders, you have there will be more problems, not the best results. It's hard to be builder when tools, necessary for construction, constantly are moving away from you. I mean, I I'm looking at my own experience. I think I am very qualified a person for many things, but again Yes, I applied.

for 400, 600 vacancies, and you were the only ones who gave I have an interview, right? wrong? I think there is. real conflict in the idea that Generation Z— this is not a group builders, therefore that we didn't...even give chance to build, right? Yes? We don't have assets. We don't have money. And everything that what is happening is that that the boomer generation sits on his own money, on your own wealth and circulates among themselves, creating all these things , which, in their opinion, will change the world, instead of in order to actively to help people, like mine generations that need this help.

Yes, I think that's it. really fair criticism. However, I I will say that if you, Guys, are you going? to claim for the title of the generation that learned and became strong in difficult times, so first principles, uh , should look like as follows. On- first, you must to understand what I understood Booker T. Washington, a namely: "I am going to build a school." THERE ARE- uh, but I'm fired slave. I am in area where people actively hate us. They accept laws against us. They will lynch us if they can.

Uh, therefore what we we are going to do, it is literally find out how to do bricks so that we can to construct a building. It's not, well, they didn't give us systems and They They are sitting on money. It just someone who thinks: "I can to look back. I I can get angry at everything, what is wrong, or am I I can learn. to make bricks." AND then, having learned to make bricks, they eventually sold bricks and build business, because they became so good at because people appreciate it.

Can I become businessman, be affection? So when you started this conversation, you said, what were you raised on because I can do anything I want. I can to be whoever I want. And what just happened formulated by Ryan, based on economic factors now. There are certain limitation. And yours the answer to him was like this: "Well, you just will have to admit, that you can't to do everything. There are certain things you you can just to achieve success." So this in itself emphasizes the difference in because in the generation, in which you grew up, you could have all the ways open to themselves, because it wasn't private share capital, monetized, operated, where now appearing Ryan.

Many of those doors that traditionally were open to people to him, now closed from some reasons. Therefore. Now he needs change and adapt. So 100% adaptation correct. It Booker T. mentality. Washington. I think that everyone in this chat needs this mentality, because in the end for all of us will have to change . But it is in this we already talked emphasize the differences between Do you have this? open area, and then Ryan says, "I I couldn't...I didn't have this open playground...Now I I can only expect 20 %, 30%, whatever it is this percentage." AND then a generation after Ryan it will be like this : "I can't do this." make.

I can't to do this. I am not I can do this. I "I will only be this." AND now they are on par peasants. Then they will start to rebel. AND then they will start to become rigid because now they are starting to realize that I don't care about this. no need. I I'm going to change everything. But if they become tough and embittered, they lose, and America will suffer more generations, because they were...damn fool. Allow explain to me clearly, What's going on? Therefore , I'm trying to say, that I don't care what they are faced with something complicated, because it doesn't matter.

If I could force it disappear, then I it wouldn't matter, and I would made it disappear. I I can't force it. disappear. He can't make it disappear. So, if this generation is coming to do something, to eat will have to to realize one fundamental the truth. What we all are must realize in the quiet darkness of the night. No one will come to save you. And therefore now these guys, if they will turn their view of things through how offended they are, things that are wrong , and will focus on destruction that I I'll repeat it again, that's what I see now.

I am very... I hope that I I'm wrong. I hope so. It algorithmic passion, and I fell into the rabbit hole a hole that actually does not respond reality. But, God My, do I really believe this? And I believe that now a mistake they all made do, is to because...that they regret what they don't have it. They condemn everything What's wrong with them? It happened that, by the way, truth. They have actually not some things. They are not will receive such easy opportunity for street investments, as generation ahead.

AND This is really terrible. but they don't have it. So now it turns out, what if you guys really want to become to the generation that again direct us to the right direction , you will have to to get rid of completely bitterness. You can't to waste time on indignation. If you plunge into poverty outrage over real injustice, what was done to you, you get haha ​​for your worries. And exactly This angers me about of what is happening in Palestine. But this is what you You tolerate me because you don't you can allow tell me something similar, and then to say that this madness.

So I was going say the first thing you you mean, first than you will go to Palestine. I will go to Palestine, and then we Let's go back. Good. So, when I I'm looking at this one. conflict, everything I... You see, this is a replay of the game. on Cyprus. Now in Cyprus the same idea. They were invaded. Cyparis was much more cruel . They were simply invaded. One day she appeared army. There was no slow immigration . An army appeared from Turkey and said: "This part of our The islands are now ours.

You guys can go. from [ __ ]. We we take all your houses. We are taking away your ports. We "We're taking everything." "And you?" can you force adults who they were kicked out of their land, uh, and that was approximately 50 years therefore, crying to this day. But since there was no additional religious component , they just moved further, tin. And so, they still will march and they will say what they want own right to return and all that , but they focused on, to make Cypress economically viable, so that the lives of their children was better than theirs life.

And they just continued to do so and started living life. And it's the same story. Booker T. Washington. This is the same as me. I really want to see. Generation Z, which was tainted by forces of the human mind, when is it distributed on time scales. The reason why this gets stuck and rhymes, consists of because people are certain in a way. It's not like that. Boomers were thinking of you and did something bad. Boomers were just those who were squeezed into that period of time, to whom had to go on these conditions.

You were just those who born at this time and you are being punished by these conditions" . But regardless of when you were born, each on individual equal has the opportunity to say: "I can to become so good at something, that I will not be able to refuse". "I don't I know if anyone can to save all one's own generation, but I know that every person can to say, “Oh, yes. I I can go and learn. to make bricks to to build a school, with like no one else to me won't help, what no one else will finance, no one will will come to me save".

I have do it yourself literally on the spot bricks and mortar. AND if I could be interested people with this, I would say: "Okay, we have there really is a chance. It people who say: me indifferently. You can try me stop. Me literally indifferent. Throw it at me. as much as you want. I I will surpass you in everything. possible relationships . And no matter what you do, to try me stop, I just I will become better. I I will just become stronger and I will continue this.

do". It unfair request. You are not must ask for it. But that's how you are are you. AND considering what exactly so you are, and there is no other alternatives, except bitterness and resentment, this how to lower your head, to get to work, to show people what you are done, to interest people this discipline, this hard work." So yesterday we were Drew waited a very long time day. Today will be hard. I'm awake again. from 2:30 p.m., trying everything to do everything prepare. And yesterday, when I...like, oh, Drew, tomorrow will be important day.

He said: " "The goals demand it." And I like this: "Damn it, "That's right." "And now, if you smile and you say: "Yeah, damn it" "Take it away." "When your a friend reminds you to go crazy and just finish this nonsense, because that's what What are you supposed to do? You're trying, well done. You Have you lost your mind? wrong? You will do the right things. If at this moment you will be to complain, to cry, to urinate, to moan, Life will knock you down, people who don't do.

And therefore, literally, the first principles, none moral condemnations. I I'm just saying that one of these principles work. Deciding, despite everything injustice, despite everything that I am being forced, I I will find a way through this. I am going to do that. , which is correct for me, for my life, and I'm going to start to move in a certain direction. And I don't I'm going to get caught. trapped in resentment. I am not I am going continue struggle. I am not I'm going to try.

to destroy something. I I am going to turn away from people who want I am angry. And I'm going to build something. I I am going to build something that matters. I think the painting Gen » Z, as a generation that driven by anger and indignant, does not understand what actually trying to do Generation Z. Generation Z is the generation that grew up to say, that you have the right to vote in this country. You You can act. You can you do these things . No one will come to you.

save. We were all taught this. AND politically, in all areas, politically in all areas, everything always... So you guys were taught that you will build this company. Well, I don't know how it is... Wait, wait, Wait. Because you are you going to say, that I don't know how it is fits. And here I am here to tell you, what is the only thing that this the country must to concentrate, is business. Don't do it. this. You don't have dollars for redistribution. I think that in life there is something more than just building business.

And I think, Kenzi, I'm back. to its original thoughts. Yes. Anger and all that—it’s not what we operate with. We operate on the idea that the only thing we really we have the right control now in in this world, is that, what is happening on at the government level. Our voice...matters. Our voice has value. This is where we are. we have control. We are not we have control over our work from 9 to 5. We don't have control over, How much is the rent? we need to pay pay.

Our rental The fee increases every year. We have no control. over the cost of gasoline. This is all that we actively studying outside of college. And that's it. is getting more expensive at the moment . Over what, on our opinion, we have CONTROL? We have control over actions, which our can use government. We vote for these people. We can protest. We we can say that What do we want? I think that this is where it comes from a lot of this. And I I understand that we all we are online bubble.

And we we see many people, which operate on the basis of anger and resentment. But I don't think we we can determine an entire generation of this. When I go to Palestinian protest and I see a bunch people who greet " Free Palestine, free Palestine, we we all stand together in this. We don't want to so that our tax the money went to the country, which genocidalizes a group people. Right? I I think this shows Generation Z has power. And this shows that we we understand that no one will not come to us save.

That's why we go out and do these things themselves. We are not sitting behind the screen phone. We are not we sit at home and don't We say, “Oh, woe is me. I can't find it. work. "We we continue to serve applications. We we continue to search ways to make ends meet with ends. I have on meaning that our the rent is like this road. People should to look for ways out work to go and, uh, pay it. IN I have friends who working for three work every week to just to make ends meet ends, and they don't even live in big cities.

I I think this is a problem. Yes. Again, uh, your eyes are directed to the problem. Your eyes aimed at the solution that is absolutely meaningless , that is, the only thing we we can control, this is a political apparatus. I will tell you the only thing which is guaranteed to be possible to be used as weapons against you, it is political apparatus. Now, listen, this important, and I definitely I think you guys must concentrate on this. Uh, if to talk about, not turn away from this, vote for people in which you Do you really believe in yourself?

conscientiously, these are the right people. I love yours. activity, but what you guys see this as a solution, not construction, is madness. And this, I I think it will be big. part of why your generation is not will choose from this problems because you "misoriented" . with the fundamental reason and as a result of how it is happening. Politics is following the flow of culture. Build things that change course culture. Tell me one one story in intimate setting, which force people to think differently. Tell stories at the cinema level and books that make people to think and to speak differently.

But when you guys... you put all your energy into what I name religious crusade around political changes, that's when I really I'm worried that your generation will not be able to to fulfill promises, given to oneself. We'll see. In this room three generation. After 30 one of us years old will make a mistake, one of one of us will die, and one of We will be embittered. We'll see. 100, we will all die. I will live to be 100. I I reach 100. There it is.

AND then I'll say this, uh, as a person who speaks on behalf of builders, no one none of these guys will die in a hundred years . There will be technological breakthroughs that even I I don't understand...Old man a group member will be able to do this use. Uh, because people live. No, I will do everything. it is possible that you lived the same way long. This will be great. We will do this together, because these things recognizable. And here's about What am I saying? We are more we don't teach people to be builders.

We are not We teach people to say: " Don't try. to force someone to create something else, to act like a father and try improve for you life". In return, Go away, damn it, build." "And if you you can create something, what people really do want, it puts you in a lot a stronger position in your own life from the perspective of control. This is also puts you in the country cause and effect connections, because The market doesn't care about you. They are not going to to do something pleasant.

They are going. to do something just because that you were able to to create something that they really want to. AND It's very sobering. AND by the way, you create jobs and tax receipt. You do everything that you really want to. If you want pay for more things in this country, you should develop this country. So the fact that that we do not respect and do not celebrating our the most successful entrepreneurs, and instead we humiliate them, as if they were some kind of evil creature in the world, it damn madness .

And by the way, when you prove political things to extremes, can't we all agree that this madness? Everyone in this room, I think, agree with one the main thing. Get money from politics. And therefore, if we agree that we want to receive money from politics, that's "How are we..." You understand that this is an institution that has reached corruption. We really want build these things. Do what really matters will make the country better. So, if you want a better job, highly paid jobs, more housing, Do all this.

And if you will have to, the only time I I was thinking about a direct line. interaction with the government, was when I tried release a product, which, as I knew, improves metabolism people, and the government hinted, what will they try Stop me. And exactly then I thought: " Okay, now we have lobbyists". "Ultimately, we they didn't do this because, thank God, they refused this politics. But this the only reason why I I would like this to do something. I am something I create, and someone makes it impossible, and I believe that this actually good for people, so I don't I will allow myself to be forgotten.

But if you not even are you trying something to build, and this simply religious crusade, this It would be crazy because now you just exist in the country vague ideas and morals that never must touch reality. Okay, we need to talk about the Law about clarity. Um, and I don't I don't know if we're from this. we will refuse. We...not I don't know if we'll tell them. what we will do after this concert. That's why we need take a little walk. We must...we must finish earlier today.

I am not sure what you mean you are talking about refusal , but, um, we have to finish early today. I will be on Piercy Morgan, uh..." Speaking of AI, so it is not necessary that there was, uh, a reset information, not removal from the register. Of course. My mistake. So no, definitely. Hey, everyone. Uh, we continue, Piers Morgan. So, I very happy about this. Uh, but it's being filmed. immediately after that, so we need to finish in a few minutes earlier. Uh, and yes, senators voted 49 against 50 for rejection the so-called Law about clarity.

Reason, why is this so wild, is that when is the Senate today voted for whether discuss the Law about clarity or not, uh, it was necessary get 60 votes, and he got 49. So 50 senators voted against. Every Democrat Plus four Republicans were against this. It was similar to a signature Trump. He said that this will be the way, with which we we will really see that we are on the front lines of what is happening from technological points of view. And, by the way, He is right.

Others countries do it. We Let's stay behind. If you don't know The law of clarity, according to basically, simply tells people, to innovators in the world finances. He tells them that this is cryptocurrency actually. Government uses whims, and then just punishes people, applying to them to court and dragging them to court, in fact, to slow down, stop people from using this. What they should do because they completely refused from their duties as administratively, both morally and honestly saying, they are leaving against the interests of this countries, without providing to people of clear regulatory framework.

It's one thing when you are you going to allow people just have to act messy, and you don't apply to them until court, and you don't trying to withdraw them out of business. Completely it's another matter when you just say, "Hey, me I'm not going to talk. you, what can you do to do, but if you will you do something wrong, I legally I will chase you. , and this is probably will put you out of business ". "It's simple madness. And we allow the government to avoid punishment for it.

This is madness. Not must love cryptocurrency. Can to think that is preferable majority Cryptocurrency is fraud, and every time, when someone does something illegal, it should be pursued. But in reality here what is happening is this is technology. It technology that scares banks. This does not have nothing to do with what people are for use this technology, such as some crypto- frauds, from which, I'm sure people are angry. But this allows you to create new species banking, which is much better for a person. But they need to know if this is security?

Is this goods? They must to go out and accept decision. And that's exactly what I had. to make a law on clarity. He will give people clarity. So the fact that they hold this hostage, there is extremely unpleasant. From the review for this, the reason why they keep him in hostages, enough banal. Therefore I a little confused because they are trying pressure trump so that he..." is impossible engage in fraud or blatantly illegal things and just continue to profit, as crazy while he in power. So, from this point of view, I, Of course, I sympathize.

But the fact that we got here, never shouldn't have gotten into Trump administration . First, it is small be done years years ago, years, years, years ago ago. So both the parties must have opportunity to gather together, having a very a simple structure that explains to people what is what , and do they want make changes to this in in the future, but to get a certain clarity because it is already happened on international level. These countries already are working. They are going to create around us leadership.

And if we we won't settle this questions, innovators will be able to start to build something in the world finances, and we we can stop to be stupid, outdated country- backward, which somehow still tries to manage the world economy.

Go deeper

• All Impact Theory episode guides